arrow
Return

Repugnance without Mere Addition

delete2026-01-01
delete0
PRE
AI
T
Tomi Francis *
DOI:10.1017/S0266267125100631delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
This paper concerns the difficulty of avoiding an additive version of the Very Repugnant Conclusion. An impossibility theorem is provided which shows that we cannot avoid this version of the Repugnant Conclusion even if we deny the Mere Addition Principle and closely related principles which place limits on the badness of adding happy people, such as Dominance Addition and additive Non-Sadism conditions. I argue that the impossibility theorem shows that the additive version of the Very Repugnant Conclusion cannot reasonably be avoided by population-ethical means alone. One must instead either deny structural conditions such as acyclicity, adopt a radically unorthodox fixed-population axiology, or accept this version of the Very Repugnant Conclusion.
Keywords:
Population ethics
population axiology
repugnant conclusion
mere addition
impossibility theorem

Journal

E
ECONOMICS & PHILOSOPHY
IF:
1.5
Papers:
25
Citations:
0

Organization

U
university of fribourg
Scholars:
867
Papers: 403
Citations: 0
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Quasi-orderings and population ethics
err1996-04-01
err0
PREAI
errCharles Blackorby; Walter Bossert; David Donaldson
errShare
errSave
Weighing Lives
err
IF0
err2005-10-01
err0
PREAI
errJohn Broome
errShare
errSave
The Asymmetry: A Solution
err2011-10-11
err0
PREAI
errMELINDA A. ROBERTS
errShare
errSave
Totalism without Repugnance
err2022-01-20
err0
PREAI
errNebel,Jacob M.
errShare
errSave
Degrees of commensurability and the repugnant conclusion
err2022-12-01
err0
PREAI
errHájek,Alan; Rabinowicz,Wlodek
errShare
errSave
Population Issues in Social Choice Theory, Welfare Economics, and Ethics
err
IF0
err2013-01-05
err0
PREAI
errCharles Blackorby; Walter Bossert; David J. Donaldson
errShare
errSave
researcher View more