arrow
Return

Rerandomization and regression adjustment

delete2019-12-31
delete57
delete
OA
AI
X
Xinran Li
P
Peng Ding *
DOI:10.1111/rssb.12353delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Randomization is a basis for the statistical inference of treatment effects without strong assumptions on the outcome-generating process. Appropriately using covariates further yields more precise estimators in randomized experiments. R. A. Fisher suggested blocking on discrete covariates in the design stage or conducting analysis of covariance in the analysis stage. We can embed blocking in a wider class of experimental design called rerandomization, and extend the classical analysis of covariance to more general regression adjustment. Rerandomization trumps complete randomization in the design stage, and regression adjustment trumps the simple difference-in-means estimator in the analysis stage. It is then intuitive to use both rerandomization and regression adjustment. Under the randomization inference framework, we establish a unified theory allowing the designer and analyser to have access to different sets of covariates. We find that asymptotically, for any given estimator with or without regression adjustment, rerandomization never hurts either the sampling precision or the estimated precision, and, for any given design with or without rerandomization, our regression-adjusted estimator never hurts the estimated precision. Therefore, combining rerandomization and regression adjustment yields better coverage properties and thus improves statistical inference. To quantify these statements theoretically, we discuss optimal regression-adjusted estimators in terms of the sampling precision and the estimated precision, and then measure the additional gains of the designer and the analyser. We finally suggest the use of rerandomization in the design and regression adjustment in the analysis followed by the Huber-White robust standard error.
Keywords:
Covariate balance
Experimental design
Potential outcome
Randomization
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

J
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology
IF:
3.6
Papers:
1.5K
Citations:
3.2W

Organization

U
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Scholars:
2.4W
Papers: 2.0W
Citations: 35
University of Illinois System cover
University of Illinois System
Scholars:
6.8W
Papers: 6.2W
Citations: 644
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Twin Photonic Hooks Generated by Twin-Ellipse Microcylinder
err2020-06-01
err0
errOAAI
errXingliang Shen; Guoqiang Gu; Liyang Shao; Zeng Peng; Jie Hu; Sankhyabrata Bandyopadhyay; Yuhui Liu; Jiahao Jiang; Ming Chen
errShare
errSave
Decomposing Treatment Effect Variation
err2018-07-09
err50
errOAAI
errDing, Peng; Feller, Avi; Miratrix, Luke
errShare
errSave
Cerebellar Ataxia, Seizures, Premature Death, and Cardiac Abnormalities in Mice with Targeted Disruption of the Cacna2d2 Gene
err2004-09-01
err0
errOAAI
errSergey V. Ivanov; Jerrold M. Ward; Lino Tessarollo; Dorothea McAreavey; Vandana Sachdev; Lameh Fananapazir; Melissa K. Banks; Nicole Morris; Draginja Djurickovic; Deborah E. Devor-Henneman; Ming-Hui Wei; Gregory W. Alvord; Boning Gao; James A. Richardson; John D. Minna; Michael A. Rogawski; Michael I. Lerman
errShare
errSave
Inference Under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization
err2018-06-28
err86
errOAAI
errBugni, Federico A.; Canay, Ivan A.; Shaikh, Azeem M.
errShare
errSave
The LOOP Estimator: Adjusting for Covariates in Randomized Experiments
err2018-11-15
err20
errOAAI
errWu, Edward; Gagnon-Bartsch, Johann A.
errShare
errSave
SHARP BOUNDS ON THE VARIANCE IN RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS
err2014-06-01
err55
errOAAI
errAronow, Peter M.; Green, Donald P.; Lee, Donald K. K.
errShare
errSave
researcher View more