.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Rethinking Methodological Appraisal in Overviews of Systematic Reviews: A Participatory Validation Framework
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
C
P
V
DOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112372.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
What’s new. • Independent appraisals of systematic reviews often vary across research teams. • Involving review authors in reassessment adds transparency to methodological ratings. • Agreement and disagreement provide insight into methodological quality/risk of bias and reporting limitations.
Keywords:
Systematic Reviews
Meta-Analysis
Risk of Bias
Reproducibility of Results
Methodology
Peer Review
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
5.2
Papers:
8.4K
Citations:
4.3W
Organization
Cited Papers