arrow
Return

Revisiting Embedding Based Graph Analyses: Hyperparameters Matter!

delete2023-11-01
delete1
PRE
AI
D
Dingqi Yang *
B
Bingqing Qu
R
Rana Hussein
P
Paolo Rosso
P
Philippe Cudré-Mauroux
刘
刘杰 (Jie Liu)
DOI:10.1109/TKDE.2022.3230743delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Graph embeddings have been widely used for many graph analysis tasks. Mainstream factorization-based and graph-sampling-based embedding learning schemes both involve many hyperparameters and design choices. However, existing techniques often adopt some heuristics for these hyperparameters and design choices with little investigation into their impact, making it unclear what is the exact performance gains of these techniques on graph analysis tasks. Against this background, this paper presents a systematic study on the impact of an extensive list of hyperparameters for both factorization-based and graph-sampling-based graph embedding techniques for homogeneous graphs. We design generalized factorization-based and graph-sampling-based techniques involving these hyperparameters, and conduct a comprehensive set of experiments with over 3,000 embedding models trained and evaluated per dataset. We reveal that much of the performance gains are indeed due to optimal hyperparameter settings/design choices rather than the sophistication of embedding models; appropriate hyperparameter settings for typical embedding techniques can outperform a sizeable collection of 18 state-of-the-art graph embedding techniques by 0.30-35.41% across different tasks. Moreover, we find that there is no one-size-fits-all hyperparameter setting across tasks, but we can indeed provide a list of task-specific practical recommendations for these hyperparameter settings/design choices, which we believe can serve as important guidelines for future research on embedding based graph analyses.
Keywords:
Graph analysis
homogeneous graph
graph embedding
network representation
matrix factorization
random walk

Journal

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering cover
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
IF:
10.4
Papers:
6.9K
Citations:
3.2W

Organization

U
University of Fribourg
Scholars:
4.7K
Papers: 4.0K
Citations: 7.5K
H
harbin institute of technology
Scholars:
8.0W
Papers: 6.6W
Citations: 66
U
University of Macau
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 1.3W
Citations: 2.0W
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

The 1965 Eruption of Taal Volcano
err1966-02-25
err0
PREAI
errJames G. Moore; Kazuaki Nakamura; Arturo Alcaraz
errShare
errSave
Polymorphism of clotting factors in Hungarian patients with Raynaud's phenomenon
err2011-01-01
err0
PREAI
errAmir-Houshang Shemirani; Edit Szomják; Emese Balogh; Csilla András; Dóra Kovács; Judit Ács; Zoltán Csiki
errShare
errSave
Prostate-derived Ets factor, an oncogenic driver in breast cancer
err2017-05-04
err0
errOAAI
errAshwani K Sood; Joseph Geradts; Jessica Young
errShare
errSave
Streaming Graph Embeddings via Incremental Neighborhood Sketching
err2022-01-01
err4
errOAAI
errYang, Dingqi; Qu, Bingqing; Yang, Jie; Wang, Liang; Cudre-Mauroux, Philippe
errShare
errSave
Silver-mediated direct trifluoromethoxylation of α-diazo esters via the −OCF3 anion
err2016-01-01
err0
PREAI
errGao-Feng Zha; Jia-Bin Han; Xiao-Qian Hu; Hua-Li Qin; Wan-Yin Fang; Cheng-Pan Zhang
errShare
errSave
Theoretical Study of AlnNn, GanNn, and InnNn(n= 4, 5, 6) Clusters
err2002-01-30
err0
PREAI
errAnil K. Kandalam; Miguel A. Blanco; Ravindra Pandey
errShare
errSave
Insurance activity and economic performance: Fresh evidence from asymmetric panel causality tests
err2018-10-24
err0
errOAAI
errAbdulnasser Hatemi‐J; Chi‐Chuan Lee; Chien‐Chiang Lee; Rangan Gupta
errShare
errSave
researcher View more