.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Robust malicious software detection and classification using global whale optimization algorithm with deep learning approach
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1038/s41598-024-76770-7.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Software malware detection and classification leverage sophisticated procedures and methods from the cybersecurity domain for identifying and categorizing malicious software, generally called malware. This procedure analyses code behaviour, file structures, and other features to distinguish between benign and malicious programs. Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) are vital in this domain, allowing the progress of dynamic and adaptive systems that identify novel and developing malware attacks. By training on massive datasets of benign and malicious instances, these systems learn patterns and signatures indicative of malware. This lets them correctly categorize and respond to potential attacks in real-time. This study presents a Global Whale Optimization Algorithm with Neutrosophic Logic for Software Malware Detection and Classification (GWOANL-SMDC) technique. The GWOANL-SMDC technique secures the software via the Android malware recognition process. Primarily, the GWOANL-SMDC technique employs the Neutrosophic Cognitive Maps (NCM) model for the feature selection process. The GWOANL-SMDC technique uses a convolutional long short-term memory (ConvLSTM) model for software malware detection. At last, the GWOA-based parameter tuning is performed to improve the performance of the ConvLSTM model. The simulation values of the GWOANL-SMDC technique are examined on the malware dataset. The obtained results ensured that the GWOANL-SMDC technique improved capability in detecting software malware.
Keywords:
Malware detection
Neutrosophic logic
Parameter tuning
Neutrosophic cognitive maps
Feature selection
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
3.9
Papers:
27.1W
Citations:
83.5W