Robust Statistical Methods for Empirical Software Engineering

Barbara Kitchenham

doi:10.1007/s10664-016-9437-5

Return

Robust Statistical Methods for Empirical Software Engineering

2016-06-16

151

PRE

DOI：10.1007/s10664-016-9437-5

Original

Original request for help

Save

Abstract

En 中文

There have been many changes in statistical theory in the past 30 years, including increased evidence that non-robust methods may fail to detect important results. The statistical advice available to software engineering researchers needs to be updated to address these issues. This paper aims both to explain the new results in the area of robust analysis methods and to provide a large-scale worked example of the new methods. We summarise the results of analyses of the Type 1 error efficiency and power of standard parametric and non-parametric statistical tests when applied to non-normal data sets. We identify parametric and non-parametric methods that are robust to non-normality. We present an analysis of a large-scale software engineering experiment to illustrate their use. We illustrate the use of kernel density plots, and parametric and non-parametric methods using four different software engineering data sets. We explain why the methods are necessary and the rationale for selecting a specific analysis. We suggest using kernel density plots rather than box plots to visualise data distributions. For parametric analysis, we recommend trimmed means, which can support reliable tests of the differences between the central location of two or more samples. When the distribution of the data differs among groups, or we have ordinal scale data, we recommend non-parametric methods such as Cliff's delta or a robust rank-based ANOVA-like method.

Keywords:

Empirical software engineering

Statistical methods

Robust methods

Robust statistical methods

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.