arrow
Return

Self-supervised clustering on image-subtracted data with deep-embedded self-organizing map

delete2022-11-02
delete4
delete
OA
AI
Y
Y. L. Mong
K
K. Ackley *
T
T. Killestein
D
D. K. Galloway
C
Christian Vassallo
M
M. Dyer
R
R. Cutter
M
M. J. I. Brown
J
J. Lyman
K
K. Ulaczyk
D
D. Steeghs
D
Dhillon, V
P
P. T. O’Brien
G
Gavin Ramsay
K
K. Noysena
R
R. Kotak
R
R. P. Breton
L
L. K. Nuttall
P
Palle, E.
D
D. Pollacco
E
E. Thrane
S
Supachai Awiphan
U
U. Burhanudin
P
P. Chote
A
A A Chrimes
E
E. J. Daw
C
C Duffy
R
R. A. J. Eyles-Ferris
B
B. P. Gompertz
T
T. Heikkilä
P
P. Irawati
M
Mark Kennedy
A
A. J. Levan
S
S. P. Littlefair
L
L. Makrygianni
T
T. R. Marsh
D
D. Mata Sánchez
S
S. Mattila
J
Justyn R. Maund
J
J. McCormac
D
D. E. Mkrtichian
J
James Mullaney
E
E. Rol
U
Utane Sawangwit
E
E. R. Stanway
R
R. L. C. Starling
P
P. A. Strøm
S
S. Tooke
K
K. Wiersema
DOI:10.1093/mnras/stac3103delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Developing an effective automatic classifier to separate genuine sources from artifacts is essential for transient follow-ups in wide-field optical surveys. The identification of transient detections from the subtraction artifacts after the image differencing process is a key step in such classifiers, known as real-bogus classification problem. We apply a self-supervised machine learning model, the deep-embedded self-organizing map (DESOM) to this 'real-bogus' classification problem. DESOM combines an autoencoder and a self-organizing map to perform clustering in order to distinguish between real and bogus detections, based on their dimensionality-reduced representations. We use 32 x 32 normalized detection thumbnails as the input of DESOM. We demonstrate different model training approaches, and find that our best DESOM classifier shows a missed detection rate of 6.6 per cent with a false-positive rate of 1.5 per cent. DESOM offers a more nuanced way to fine-tune the decision boundary identifying likely real detections when used in combination with other types of classifiers, e.g. built on neural networks or decision trees. We also discuss other potential usages of DESOM and its limitations.
Keywords:
methods: observational

Journal

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society cover
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
IF:
4.8
Papers:
7.0W
Citations:
25.0W

Organization

U
University of Turku
Scholars:
1.7W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 2.0W
M
Monash University
Scholars:
5.4W
Papers: 5.4W
Citations: 79
U
universidad de la laguna
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 8.0K
Citations: 38
U
University of Portsmouth
Scholars:
5.1K
Papers: 5.4K
Citations: 9.2K
U
university of leicester
Scholars:
2.0W
Papers: 1.7W
Citations: 25
I
instituto de astrofisica de canarias
Scholars:
4.3K
Papers: 5.0K
Citations: 31
U
University of Manchester
Scholars:
5.7W
Papers: 5.2W
Citations: 7.4W
researcher View more organizations