.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Sex and gender specific considerations on frailty: what have we learned?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
M
V
G
G
L
S
M
V
DOI：10.1016/j.ejim.2026.107130.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Aging entails a progressive impairment of functions and, ultimately, leads to increased susceptibility to disability, morbidity, and mortality. Around 85% of people aged more than 75 years suffer from chronic diseases. Patients with chronic conditions often present a complex interplay of multimorbidity, polypharmacy and frailty, which are influenced by several characteristics of individuals, including biological sex (i.e., biological attributes, determined by the sex chromosomes, genes, reproductive and endocrine system) and sociocultural gender (i.e., a social construct which refers to culture-bound conventions, roles, and behaviours of individuals). The present narrative review aims to explore the impact of sex and gender on frailty and its related adverse outcomes. Addressing the health needs of the aged population requires the integration of both clinical and individual complexity into decision-making processes and organizational flows to pursue an effective implementation of precision medicine, in the quest to improve outcomes for all people.
Journal
IF:
6.1
Papers:
5.8K
Citations:
8.6K
Organization
Cited Papers