arrow
Return

Sex differences in visual working memory processing dynamics

delete2026-05-08
delete0
PRE
AI
A
Andres A. Gonzalez-Garrido
A
Adrián Ávila-Garibay
S
Steven Woltering
F
Fabiola R. Gómez-Velázquez
G
Geisa B. Gallardo‐Moreno *
DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2026.116127delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The influence of sex on visuospatial working memory processing has been repeatedly studied, suggesting a significant male advantage. However, sex-related dynamic adaptations of brain connectivity during the time course of working memory processing remain elusive. We analyzed the electroencephalographic functional connectivity across different frequency bands using phase-locking synchronization to evaluate the effect of sex during the performance of a modified version of the Sternberg task, across different stages of working memory (WM) processing namely: encoding, maintenance, and retrieval. Forty-five university students (23 female, 22 male) performed the task using memory sets of five uppercase letters, followed by a single lowercase letter serving as the probe. Behavioral results showed slower reaction times for females, who exhibited higher connectivity indices in the theta frequency range during maintenance, particularly involving the left frontal and right posterior temporal areas. In contrast, males showed higher fronto-parietal connectivity in the alpha band during the maintenance and retrieval WM stages, and in the beta band during retrieval. The results suggest a significant effect of sex, not only affecting the behavioral response but also imposing a distinct brain functional dynamic, which likely underlies different cognitive processing strategies.
Keywords:
Working memory
Brain connectivity
Sex differences
Sternberg task
EEG

Journal

Behavioural Brain Research cover
Behavioural Brain Research
IF:
2.3
Papers:
1.0K
Citations:
2.6W

Organization

Universidad de Guadalajara cover
Universidad de Guadalajara
Scholars:
1.5K
Papers: 500
Citations: 2.7K
T
Texas A&M University System
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 4.0K
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

The influence of working memory load on phase specific patterns of cortical activity
err2004-11-01
err0
PREAI
errTara A. Cairo; Peter F. Liddle; Todd S. Woodward; Elton T.C. Ngan
errShare
errSave
Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks
err2010-12-01
err0
PREAI
errAndrew Zalesky; Alex Fornito; Edward T. Bullmore
errShare
errSave
Perception's shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity
err1999-02-01
err0
PREAI
errEugenio Rodriguez; Nathalie George; Jean-Philippe Lachaux; Jacques Martinerie; Bernard Renault; Francisco J. Varela
errShare
errSave
Theta oscillations shift towards optimal frequency for cognitive control
err2022-04-21
err0
errOAAI
errMehdi Senoussi; Pieter Verbeke; Kobe Desender; Esther De Loof; Durk Talsma; Tom Verguts
errShare
errSave
Sex Differences in Verbal Working Memory: A Systematic Review an Meta-Analysis
err2021-04-01
err42
PREAI
errVoyer, Daniel; Saint Aubin, Jean; Altman, Katelyn; Gallant, Genevieve
errShare
errSave
Sex based differences in functional connectivity during a working memory task: an fNIRS study
err2024-02-08
err0
errOAAI
errSima Shirzadi; Mehrdad Dadgostar; Zahra Einalou; Sinem Burcu Erdoğan; Ata Akin
errShare
errSave
No Gender Differences in Brain Activation During the N-Back Task: An fMRI Study in Healthy Individuals
err2009-04-22
err94
errOAAI
errSchmidt, Heike; Jogia, Jigar; Fast, Kristina; Christodoulou, Tessa; Haldane, Morgan; Kumari, Veena; Frangou, Sophia
errShare
errSave
researcher View more