.png){kind=icon}
Return
Shared Decision Making or Sharing Information?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/jep.70352.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Rationale: Even given identical information, patients and healthcare professionals may appropriately make conflicting decisions. Aims and objectives: Introduce the concept of mutual two-person, as opposed to individual, decision making. Method: Present operational definition of shared decision making based on two-person decision theory demonstrate how to identify a shared decision, distinguish between a shared decision and some other commonly used approaches, and report the results of computer simulations that demonstrate the patterns of mutual satisfaction of various decision approached given common information. Results: Shared decision making yields more mutually stable and satisfactory treatment decisions than do other approaches and have the additional advantage of achieving fewer morally questionable outcomes. Conclusion: In addition to shared information, shared decisions are superior to those made independently by patients or healthcare professionals.
Keywords:
negotiation
optimization
patient satisfaction
rank-order choice
shared decision making
Journal
J
IF:
2.1
Papers:
162
Citations:
5.8K
Organization
Cited Papers
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveThe role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: How low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition.png)
NEUROSCIENTIST
NEUROSCIENTISTIF3.9
PREAI
ShareSaveShareSave
ShareSave
View more