.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Simple tension three ways
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112497.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
The consequences of using a principal Cauchy stress formulation of simple tension of cuboid specimens are explored within the context of incompressible isotropic materials, with the prototypical neo-Hookean material used to illustrate the main ideas. When simple tension is defined in this way it is shown that there are three natural Cartesian forms for the Cauchy stress: the conventional form, a plane stress form and a uniform stress form. A deformation consistent with each of these forms is obtained for the neo-Hookean material and it is shown that there are some counter-intuitive effects. It is also shown that the plane stress form of simple tension could alternatively describe the effect of applying equal and opposite forces to diagonally opposite edges of a cuboid specimen, with the uniform stress form describing the effect of applying these forces to diagonally opposite corners of a cuboid.
Keywords:
Simple tension
Principal stresses and stretches
Incompressible isotropic hyperelastic materials
neo-Hookean material
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
3.8
Papers:
1.2W
Citations:
3.1W