arrow
Return

Simple versus complex forecasting: The evidence

delete2015-08-01
delete149
delete
OA
AI
K
Kesten C. Green *
J
J. Scott Armstrong
DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.026delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
This article introduces this JBR Special Issue on simple versus complex methods in forecasting. Simplicity in forecasting requires that (I) method, (2) representation of cumulative knowledge, (3) relationships in models, and (4) relationships among models, forecasts, and decisions are all sufficiently uncomplicated as to be easily understood by decision-makers. Our review of studies comparing simple and complex methods - including those in this special issue - found 97 comparisons in 32 papers. None of the papers provide a balance of evidence that complexity improves forecast accuracy. Complexity increases forecast error by 27 percent on average in the 25 papers with quantitative comparisons. The finding is consistent with prior research to identify valid forecasting methods: all 22 previously identified evidence-based forecasting procedures are simple. Nevertheless, complexity remains popular among researchers, forecasters, and clients. Some evidence suggests that the popularity of complexity may be due to incentives: (1) researchers are rewarded for publishing in highly ranked journals, which favor complexity; (2) forecasters can use complex methods to provide forecasts that support decision-makers' plans; and (3) forecasters' clients may be reassured by incomprehensibility. Clients who prefer accuracy should accept forecasts only from simple evidence-based procedures. They can rate the simplicity of forecasters' procedures using the questionnaire at simple-forecasting.com. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Analytics
Big data
Decision-making
Decomposition
Econometrics
Occam's razor
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Journal of Business Research cover
Journal of Business Research
IF:
9.8
Papers:
1.0W
Citations:
8.7W

Organization

U
University of South Australia
Scholars:
9.0K
Papers: 1.1W
Citations: 1.6W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Relative performance of methods for forecasting special events
err2015-08-01
err22
errOAAI
errNikolopoulos, Konstantinos; Litsa, Akrivi; Petropoulos, Fotios; Bougioukos, Vasileios; Khammash, Marwan
errShare
errSave
Variabilidade genética para caracteres morfométricos de matrizes de castanha-do-brasil da Amazônia Mato-grossense
err2010-12-01
err0
errOAAI
errFlora Ferreira Camargo; Reginaldo Brito da Costa; Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende; Raul Alffonso Rodrigues Roa; Natasha Brianez Rodrigues; Leonardo Vivaldini dos Santos; Ana Carla Almeida de Freitas
errShare
errSave
The effect of PM10 on human lung fibroblasts
err2009-05-20
err0
errOAAI
errDF Alley; S Langley-Turnbaugh; NR Gordon; JP Wise; G Van Epps; A Jalbert
errShare
errSave
Identificando as melhores práticas operacionais através da associação Benchmarking-Dea: o caso das refinarias de petróleo
err2006-04-01
err0
errOAAI
errVinícius Albuquerque Vasconcellos; Alberto Gabbay Canen; Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Forecasting new product trial with analogous series
err2015-08-01
err18
errOAAI
errWright, Malcolm J.; Stern, Philip
errShare
errSave
researcher View more