arrow
Return

Simulation-Based Training in Brain Death Determination

delete2014-04-02
delete47
PRE
AI
B
Benjamin J. MacDougall
J
Jennifer D. Robinson
L
Liana J. Kappus
S
Stephanie N. Sudikoff
D
David M. Greer *
DOI:10.1007/s12028-014-9975-xdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Despite straightforward guidelines on brain death determination by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), substantial practice variability exists internationally, between states, and among institutions. We created a simulation-based training course on proper determination based on the AAN practice parameters to address and assess knowledge and practice gaps at our institution. Our intervention consisted of a didactic course and a simulation exercise, and was bookended by before and after multiple-choice tests. The 40-min didactic course, including a video demonstration, covered all aspects of the brain death examination. Simulation sessions utilized a SimMan 3G manikin and involved a complete examination, including an apnea test. Possible confounders and signs incompatible with brain death were embedded throughout. Facilitators evaluated performance with a 26-point checklist based on the most recent AAN guidelines. A senior neurologist conducted all aspects of the course, including the didactic session, simulation, and debriefing session. Ninety physicians from multiple specialties have participated in the didactic session, 38 of whom have completed the simulation. Pre-test scores were poor (41.4 %), with attendings scoring higher than residents (46.6 vs. 40.4 %, p = 0.07), and neurologists and neurosurgeons significantly outperforming other specialists (53.9 vs. 38.9 %, p = 0.003). Post-test scores (73.3 %) were notably higher than pre-test scores (45.4 %). Participant feedback has been uniformly positive. Baseline knowledge of brain death determination among providers was low but improved greatly after the course. Our intervention represents an effective model that can be replicated at other institutions to train clinicians in the determination of brain death according to evidence-based guidelines.
Keywords:
Brain death
Coma
Training course
Simulation
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Neurocritical Care cover
Neurocritical Care
IF:
3.6
Papers:
4.0K
Citations:
6.9K

Organization

Y
Yale University
Scholars:
6.5W
Papers: 6.0W
Citations: 10.0W
Y
Yale New Haven Hospital
Scholars:
781
Papers: 577
Citations: 1.5K
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Mast cell tryptase release and asthmatic responses to allergen increase with regular use of salbutamol
err2000-07-01
err0
errOAAI
errVeronica A. Swystun; John R. Gordon; E.Beth Davis; Xiaobei Zhang; Donald W. Cockcroft
errShare
errSave
Variability of brain death determination guidelines in leading US neurologic institutions
err2008-01-22
err189
PREAI
errGreer, David M.; Varelas, Panayiotis N.; Haque, Shamael; Wijdicks, Eelco F. M.
errShare
errSave
The 3D Model of Debriefing: Defusing, Discovering, and Deepening
err2011-04-01
err195
PREAI
errZigmont, Jason J.; Kappus, Liana J.; Sudikoff, Stephanie N.
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Practice variability in brain death determination A call to action
err2013-12-03
err50
errOAAI
errShappell, Claire N.; Frank, Jeffrey I.; Husari, Khalil; Sanchez, Matthew; Goldenberg, Fernando; Ardelt, Agnieszka
errShare
errSave
no more