.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.ijar.2009.02.006.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
The issue of formalizing skepticism relations between argumentation semantics has been considered only recently in the literature. In this paper we provide a twofold contribution to this kind of analysis. First, starting from the traditional concepts of skeptical and credulous acceptance, we introduce a comprehensive set of seven skepticism relations, which provide a formal Counterpart to several alternative notions of skepticism at an intuitive level. Then we carry out a systematic comparison of a significant set of literature semantics (namely grounded, complete, preferred, stable, semi-stable, ideal. prudent and CF2 sennantics) on the basis of the proposed skepticism relations. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Argumentation theory
Argumentation semantics
Skepticism relations
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
3
Papers:
2.9K
Citations:
5.1K