arrow
Return

Solving quantified constraint satisfaction problems with value selection rules

delete2020-03-16
delete4
PRE
AI
J
Jian Gao
J
Jinyan Wang
K
Kuixian Wu
R
Rong Chen *
DOI:10.1007/s11704-019-9179-9delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Solving a quantified constraint satisfaction problem (QCSP) is usually a hard task due to its computational complexity. Exact algorithms play an important role in solving this problem, among which backtrack algorithms are effective. In a backtrack algorithm, an important step is assigning a variable by a chosen value when exploiting a branch, and thus a good value selection rule may speed up greatly. In this paper, we propose two value selection rules for existentially and universally quantified variables, respectively, to avoid unnecessary searching. The rule for universally quantified variables is prior to trying failure values in previous branches, and the rule for existentially quantified variables selects the promising values first. Two rules are integrated into the state-of-the-art QCSP solver, i.e., QCSP-Solve, which is an exact solver based on backtracking. We perform a number of experiments to evaluate improvements brought by our rules. From computational results, we can conclude that the new value selection rules speed up the solver by 5 times on average and 30 times at most. We also show both rules perform well particularly on instances with existentially and universally quantified variables occurring alternatively.
Keywords:
quantified CSP
backtracking
value selection
fail-first principle
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Frontiers of Computer Science cover
Frontiers of Computer Science
IF:
4.6
Papers:
1.6K
Citations:
2.8K

Organization

G
Guangxi Normal University
Scholars:
7.7K
Papers: 4.9K
Citations: 5.1K
D
Dalian Maritime University
Scholars:
1.2W
Papers: 7.8K
Citations: 6.3K