arrow
Return

Sparse Bayesian Classification of EEG for Brain-Computer Interface

delete2016-11-01
delete214
PRE
AI
Y
Yu Zhang *
周郭许 (Guoxu Zhou)
金晶 (Jing Jin)
Q
Qibin Zhao
X
Xingyu Wang
A
Andrzej Cichocki
DOI:10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2476656delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Regularization has been one of the most popular approaches to prevent overfitting in electroencephalogram (EEG) classification of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). The effectiveness of regularization is often highly dependent on the selection of regularization parameters that are typically determined by cross-validation (CV). However, the CV imposes two main limitations on BCIs: 1) a large amount of training data is required from the user and 2) it takes a relatively long time to calibrate the classifier. These limitations substantially deteriorate the system's practicability and may cause a user to be reluctant to use BCIs. In this paper, we introduce a sparse Bayesian method by exploiting Laplace priors, namely, SBLaplace, for EEG classification. A sparse discriminant vector is learned with a Laplace prior in a hierarchical fashion under a Bayesian evidence framework. All required model parameters are automatically estimated from training data without the need of CV. Extensive comparisons are carried out between the SBLaplace algorithm and several other competing methods based on two EEG data sets. The experimental results demonstrate that the SBLaplace algorithm achieves better overall performance than the competing algorithms for EEG classification.
Keywords:
Brain-computer interface (BCI)
electroencephalogram (EEG)
event-related potential (ERP)
Laplace prior
sparse Bayesian classification
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems cover
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
IF:
8.9
Papers:
7.5K
Citations:
7.2W

Organization

R
riken
Scholars:
2.2W
Papers: 1.9W
Citations: 24