.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Spatial distribution patterns across multiple microbial taxonomic groups
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.envres.2023.115470.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Even in the vertical dimension, soil bacterial communities are spatially distributed in a distance-decay rela-tionship (DDR). However, whether this pattern is universal among all soil microbial taxonomic groups, and how body size influences this distribution, remains elusive. Our study consisted of obtaining 140 soil samples from two adjacent ecosystems in the Yellow River Delta (YRD), both nontidal and tidal, and measuring the DDR between topsoil and subsoil for bacteria, archaea, fungi and protists (rhizaria). Our results showed that the entire community generally fitted the DDR patterns (P < 0.001), this was also true at the kingdom level (P < 0.001, with the exception of the fungal community), and for most individual phyla (47/75) in both ecosystems and with soil depth. Meanwhile, these results presented a general trend that the community turnover rate of nontidal soils was higher than tidal soils (P < 0.05), and that the rate of topsoil was also higher than that of subsoil (P < 0.05). Additionally, microbial spatial turnover rates displayed a negative relationship with body sizes in nontidal topsoil (R2 = 0.29, P = 0.009), suggesting that the smaller the body size of microorganisms, the stronger the spatial limitation was in this environment. However, in tidal soils, the body size effect was negligible, probably owing to the water's fluidity. Moreover, community assembly was judged to be deterministic, and heterogeneous selection played a dominant role in the different environments. Specifically, the spatial distance was much more influential, while the soil salinity in these ecosystems was the major environmental factor in selecting the dis-tributions of microbial communities. Overall, this study revealed that microbial community compositions at different taxonomic levels followed relatively consistent distribution patterns and mechanisms in this coastal area.
Keywords:
Spatial distribution
Dispersal limitation
Environmental selection
Taxonomic levels
Body size
Salinity
Journal
IF:
7.7
Papers:
2.0W
Citations:
9.0W