arrow
Return

Spatial Memory in Insect Navigation

delete2013-09-01
delete267
delete
OA
AI
M
M. J. Collett *
L
Lars Chıttka
T
Thomas E. Collett
DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.020delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
A wide variety of insects use spatial memories in behaviours like holding a position in air or flowing water, in returning to a place of safety, and in foraging. The Hymenoptera, in particular, have evolved life-histories requiring reliable spatial memories to support the task of provisioning their young. Behavioural experiments, primarily on social bees and ants, reveal the mechanisms by which these memories are employed for guidance to spatial goals and suggest how the memories, and the processing streams that use them, may be organized. We discuss three types of memory-based guidance which, together, can explain a large part of observed insect spatial behaviour. Two of these, alignment image-matching and positional image-matching, are based on an insect's remembered views of its surroundings: The first uses views to keep to a familiar heading and the second to head towards a familiar place. The third type of guidance is based on a process of path integration by which an insect monitors its distance and direction from its nest through odometric and compass information. To a large degree, these guidance mechanisms appear to involve modular computational systems. We discuss the lack of evidence for cognitive maps in insects, and in particular the evidence against a map based on path integration, in which view-based and path integration memories might be combined. We suggest instead that insects have a collective of separate guidance systems, which cooperate and train each other, and together provide reliable guidance over a range of conditions.
Keywords:
DESERT ANTS CATAGLYPHIS
SOLITARY WASPS CERCERIS
NEST-MARK ORIENTATION
ROUTE-BASED MEMORIES
PATH-INTEGRATION
VECTOR NAVIGATION
INFORMATION-TRANSFER
PATTERN-RECOGNITION
VISUAL LANDMARKS
CELESTIAL SYSTEM
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Current Biology cover
Current Biology
IF:
7.5
Papers:
2.2W
Citations:
7.8W

Organization

Q
Queen Mary University London
Scholars:
2.0W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 327
U
University of Exeter
Scholars:
2.0W
Papers: 2.1W
Citations: 3.6W
U
university of london
Scholars:
21.5W
Papers: 19.7W
Citations: 305
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

errShare
errSave
Mono-ADP-ribosylation by ARTD10 restricts Chikungunya virus replication by interfering with the proteolytic activity of nsP2
err
IF0
err2020-01-08
err0
errOAAI
errSarah Krieg; Fabian Pott; Laura Eckei; Maud Verheirstraeten; Mareike Bütepage; Barbara Lippok; Christine Goffinet; Bernhard Lüscher; Patricia Verheugd
errShare
errSave
Gaze displacement and inter-segmental coordination during large whole body voluntary rotations
err2008-11-12
err0
PREAI
errDimitri Anastasopoulos; Nausica Ziavra; Mark Hollands; Adolfo Bronstein
errShare
errSave
The hTH-GFP Reporter Rat Model for the Study of Parkinson's Disease
err2014-12-02
err0
errOAAI
errLorraine Iacovitti; Xiaotao Wei; Jingli Cai; Eric W. Kostuk; Ruihe Lin; Alexander Gorodinsky; Philip Roman; Gretchen Kusek; Sonal S. Das; Audrey Dufour; Terina N. Martinez; Kuldip D. Dave
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Hyposmia Is Associated with Reduced Cognitive Function in COVID-19: First Preliminary Results
err2021-04-14
err0
errOAAI
errAgnes Pirker-Kees; Kirsten Platho-Elwischger; Sebastian Hafner; Kurt Redlich; Christoph Baumgartner
errShare
errSave
Visual cues for the retrieval of landmark memories by navigating wood ants
err2007-01-01
err67
errOAAI
errHarris, Robert A.; Graham, Paul; Collett, Thomas S.
errShare
errSave
researcher View more