.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Structure of the energy performance gap in an education nearly zero-energy building (nZEB)
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
Ł
K
Ł
R
M
A
DOI：10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.118043.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
• Three years of monitoring of an educational nZEB in a Dfb climate. • Monthly data reveal design stage errors hidden by annual energy balances. • HVAC, DHW, lighting, auxiliaries, controls and PV were analysed separately. • Whole-building final energy use was 17-31% lower than predicted (over monitored years). • Yet HVAC energy use was 104-116% higher than predicted.
Keywords:
Energy performance gap
EPG structure
nZEB
Building management system
Final energy
AHU
,
Air Handling Unit
Aux
,
Auxiliary (Energy)
BMS
,
Building Management System
BPC
,
Building Performance Certificate
CHP
,
Combined Heat and Power
CO₂
,
Carbon Dioxide
DCV
,
Demand Controlled Ventilation
DHW
,
Domestic Hot Water
EAHE
,
Earth Air Heat Exchanger
EPBD
,
Energy Performance Building Directive
EPG
,
Energy Performance Gap
EU
,
European Union
FE
,
Final Energy
GHE
,
Ground Heat Exchanger
HP
,
Heat Pump
HVAC
,
Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning
LENI
,
Lighting Energy Numeric Indicator
NZEB
,
Net zero Energy Building
nZEB
,
Nearly zero Energy Building
PE
,
Primary Energy
PV
,
Photovoltaic
RES
,
Renewable Energy Sources
SD
,
Standard Deviation
TABS
,
Thermally Activated Building Slabs
TC
,
Technical Conditions [1]
TMY
,
Typical Meteorological Year
TRT
,
Thermal Response Test
VRF
,
Variable Refrigerant Flow
ZEB
,
Zero Energy Buildings
Journal
IF:
7.1
Papers:
1.5W
Citations:
6.8W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers