arrow
Return

Suicide Prevention Programming: Comparing Four Prominent Frameworks

delete2024-08-01
delete1
PRE
AI
B
Bryann B. DeBeer *
J
Joseph Mignogna
M
Margaret Talbot
E
Edgar Villarreal
N
Nathaniel V. Mohatt
E
Elisa V. Borah
P
Patricia D. Russell
C
Craig J. Bryan
L
Lindsey L. Monteith
K
Kathryn Bongiovanni
C
Claire A. Hoffmire
A
Alan L. Peterson
J
Jenna Heise
S
Sylvia Baack
K
Kimberly Weinberg
M
Marcy Polk
J
Justin K. Benzer
DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20230173delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Objective: Suicide is a significant public health concern. About 48,000 individuals died by suicide in 2021 in the United States, and approximately one in 100 deaths globally are due to suicide. Continuing efforts in program development and evaluation are vital to preventing suicide. Multiple frameworks have been developed to reduce suicide rates, but they have not been compared to assess their comprehensiveness, nor have their components been classified. Methods: In 2019, the authors conducted a narrative review of the literature and identified four major frameworks for suicide prevention: the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Suicide Prevention Program, the Defense Suicide Prevention Program of the U.S. Department of Defense, Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care, and the technical package developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Program components for these frameworks were identified and classified by using two prevention strategy classification systems: the National Academy of Medicine's (NAM's) continuum-of-care model and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's (SAMHSA's) prevention model. Results: The cross-program comparison revealed that no single program included all components of suicide prevention programs. However, the VA program was the most comprehensive in terms of the number of components and their spread across prevention strategy classifications. The programs used few components categorized under NAM's promotion or selective prevention strategy classifications. The SAMHSA prevention strategy classifications of information dissemination, community-based processes, and positive alternatives were also used infrequently. Conclusions: Organizations, health care systems, and pol- icy makers may use these findings as they develop, improve, and implement suicide prevention programs.

Journal

Psychiatric Services cover
Psychiatric Services
IF:
3.2
Papers:
8.5K
Citations:
1.2W

Organization

B
booz allen hamilton holding corporation
Scholars:
252
Papers: 146
Citations: 1
University of Colorado System cover
University of Colorado System
Scholars:
6.3W
Papers: 5.5W
Citations: 1.8K
U
university of colorado at colorado springs
Scholars:
691
Papers: 602
Citations: 2
U
university of texas health science center at san antonio
Scholars:
8.8K
Papers: 6.6K
Citations: 14
U
university of texas austin
Scholars:
2.4W
Papers: 2.0W
Citations: 54
E
education development center (edc)
Scholars:
127
Papers: 79
Citations: 0
B
Baylor College of Medicine
Scholars:
4.1W
Papers: 3.0W
Citations: 4.2W
U
university of texas system
Scholars:
18.5W
Papers: 15.6W
Citations: 210
O
Ohio State University
Scholars:
4.1W
Papers: 3.2W
Citations: 80
researcher View more organizations