arrow
Return

Systematic classification differences across eye movement detection algorithms

delete2026-04-10
delete0
delete
OA
AI
J
Jonathan Nir *
L
Leon Y. Deouell
DOI:10.3758/s13428-026-02983-5delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Eye movement (EM) detection is a critical step in most eye-tracking (ET) research, typically relying on detectors–specialized algorithms designed to segment raw ET data into discrete oculomotor events. However, variability in detection algorithms and the lack of standardized evaluation frameworks hinder transparency and reproducibility across studies. In this work, we introduce pEYES, an open-source toolkit designed to streamline EM detection and enable robust, quantitative comparisons between detectors. The toolkit provides implementations for several widely used threshold-based detectors, along with multiple standardized evaluation procedures for assessing detection performance. Using pEYES, we evaluated seven detection algorithms on two publicly available human-annotated datasets containing recordings of subjects freely viewing color images. Performance was assessed using metrics such as Cohen’s kappa, relative timing offset and deviation, and a sensitivity index ( $$d{\prime}$$ ) for fixation and saccade onsets and offsets. Engbert’s adaptive velocity-threshold algorithm consistently matched or outperformed the other detectors, occasionally achieving human-level precision. In contrast, several other detectors exhibited substantial variability in performance between datasets. We also found systematic differences in detection scores between fixation and saccade boundaries, with fixation offsets and saccade onsets detected more reliably than their counterparts. These findings highlight the importance of task- and dataset-specific detector selection in EM analysis. The pEYES toolkit is freely available, and its codebase – along with the analyses presented in this report – is accessible at https://github.com/huji-hcnl/pEYES . We invite the research community to use, extend, and contribute to its ongoing development. Through open collaboration, we aim to advance the rigor and reproducibility of EM detection practices.
Keywords:
Eye tracking
Eye movement detection
Algorithm evaluation
Open source
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Behavior Research Methods cover
Behavior Research Methods
IF:
3.9
Papers:
719
Citations:
3.6W

Organization

E
Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences
Scholars:
8
Papers: 3
Citations: 0
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Saccadic spike potentials in gamma-band EEG: Characterization, detection and suppression
err2010-02-01
err0
PREAI
errAlon S. Keren; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Leon Y. Deouell
errShare
errSave
Using machine learning to detect events in eye-tracking data
err2017-02-23
err0
errOAAI
errRaimondas Zemblys; Diederick C. Niehorster; Oleg Komogortsev; Kenneth Holmqvist
errShare
errSave
What is a blink? Classifying and characterizing blinks in eye openness signals
err2024-02-29
err0
errOAAI
errMarcus Nyström; Richard Andersson; Diederick C. Niehorster; Roy S. Hessels; Ignace T. C. Hooge
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Is the eye-movement field confused about fixations and saccades? A survey among 124 researchers
err2018-08-29
err0
errOAAI
errRoy S. Hessels; Diederick C. Niehorster; Marcus Nyström; Richard Andersson; Ignace T. C. Hooge
errShare
errSave
One algorithm to rule them all? An evaluation and discussion of ten eye movement event-detection algorithms
err2016-05-18
err0
errOAAI
errRichard Andersson; Linnea Larsson; Kenneth Holmqvist; Martin Stridh; Marcus Nyström
errShare
errSave
Standardization of Automated Analyses of Oculomotor Fixation and Saccadic Behaviors
err2010-11-01
err0
PREAI
errOleg V Komogortsev; Denise V Gobert; Sampath Jayarathna; Do Hyong Koh; Sandeep M Gowda
errShare
errSave
researcher View more