arrow
Return

Systematic Representative Design: A Reply to Commentaries

delete2020-01-04
delete2
delete
OA
AI
L
Lynn C. Miller *
D
David C. Jeong
L
Liyuan Wang
S
Sonia Jawaid Shaikh
T
Traci K. Gillig
C
Carlos Gustavo Godoy
P
Paul Robert Appleby
C
Charisse L’Pree Corsbie-Massay
S
Stacy Marsella
J
John L. Christensen
S
Stephen J. Read
DOI:10.1080/1047840X.2019.1698908delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Systematic Representative Design (SRD), enabled by today's technologies leverages many of the strengths of past designs into a new synthesis affording the capacity for both causal inference and generalizability to everyday life (GEL). In doing so, it could help better integrate past and ongoing empirical research findings in psychology. Generally, the commentaries were positive and thought-provoking. Delightfully, they gave us new opportunities to both clarify misunderstandings as well as further address the feasibility of this approach.
Keywords:
Virtual environments
Virtual Reality
Sampling
Systematic Representative Design
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Psychological Inquiry cover
Psychological Inquiry
IF:
4.1
Papers:
989
Citations:
7.0K

Organization

U
university of southern california
Scholars:
4.6W
Papers: 3.8W
Citations: 51
U
University of Connecticut
Scholars:
2.4W
Papers: 2.2W
Citations: 2.5W
U
university of glasgow
Scholars:
3.5W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 37
S
Syracuse University
Scholars:
5.4K
Papers: 5.2K
Citations: 8.3K
W
washington state university
Scholars:
1.8W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 114
researcher View more organizations