Return
Systematic review methods
DOI:10.1080/1750984X.2021.1966823.png)
Abstract
En 中文
Increasingly, sport and exercise psychology researchers are using systematic review methods to examine the evidence on a particular topic. Unfortunately, not all systematic reviews are created equal and the methodological quality of the review will depend on the quality of the methods used in the review process. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of essential methods and resources used in systematic reviews that serve to increase transparency, replicability, robustness, ethics, and translation of results. To achieve our purpose, we describe aspects of the systematic review process including best standards for planning and conducting a systematic review, coherence, literature searches, article screening, data extraction, reporting guidelines, open science practices, publication ethics, and disseminating results. In providing an overview of these methods for systematic reviews, we highlight relevant literature, resources, and examples from the sport and exercise psychology literature. Finally, we offer nine guidelines to follow to enhance systematic review methods used in sport and exercise psychology.
Keywords:
Literature review
literature search
open science
article screening
knowledge translation
publication ethics
Journal
IF:
6.7
Papers:
305
Citations:
2.6K
Organization
Cited Papers
Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
IF3.9
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
IF3.9
Knowledge translation strategies for dissemination with a focus on healthcare recipients: an overview of systematic reviews
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE
IF13.4

