arrow
Return

TabAttackBench: A benchmark for adversarial attacks on tabular data

delete2025-11-19
delete0
delete
OA
AI
Z
Zhipeng He
C
Chun Ouyang
闻立杰 (Lijie Wen)
C
Cong Liu
C
Catarina Moreira
DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130491delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Adversarial attacks pose a significant threat to machine learning models by inducing incorrect predictions through imperceptible perturbations to input data. While these attacks are well studied in unstructured domains such as images, their behaviour on tabular data remains underexplored due to mixed feature types and complex inter-feature dependencies. This study introduces a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates adversarial attacks on tabular datasets with respect to both effectiveness and imperceptibility. We assess five white-box attack algorithms (FGSM, BIM, PGD, DeepFool, and C&W) across four representative models (LR, MLP, TabTransformer and FT-Transformer) using eleven datasets spanning finance, energy, and healthcare domains. The benchmark employs four quantitative imperceptibility metrics (proximity, sparsity, deviation, and sensitivity) to characterise perturbation realism. The analysis quantifies the trade-off between these two aspects and reveals consistent differences between attack types, with ℓ∞-based attacks achieving higher success but lower subtlety, and ℓ2-based attacks offering more realistic perturbations. The benchmark findings offer actionable insights for designing more imperceptible adversarial attacks, advancing the understanding of adversarial vulnerability in tabular machine learning.
Keywords:
Adversarial attack
Tabular data
Benchmark
Machine learning
Robustness
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Expert Systems with Applications cover
Expert Systems with Applications
IF:
7.5
Papers:
2.9W
Citations:
10.2W

Organization

T
tsinghua university
Scholars:
11.7W
Papers: 10.0W
Citations: 137
N
Nova University of Lisbon
Scholars:
154
Papers: 76
Citations: 1
U
university of technology sydney
Scholars:
1.6W
Papers: 2.0W
Citations: 25
Q
Queensland University of Technology
Scholars:
1.7K
Papers: 883
Citations: 2.8W
researcher View more organizations