Return
Target differentiation with simple infrared sensors using statistical pattern recognition techniques
DOI:10.1016/j.patcog.2007.01.007.png)
Abstract
En 中文
This study compares the performances of various statistical pattern recognition techniques for the differentiation of commonly encountered features in indoor environments, possibly with different surface properties, using simple infrared (IR) sensors. The intensity measurements obtained from such sensors are highly dependent on the location, geometry, and surface properties of the reflecting feature in a way that cannot be represented by a simple analytical relationship, therefore complicating the differentiation process. We construct feature vectors based on the parameters of angular IR intensity scans from different targets to determine their geometry and/or surface type. Mixture of normals classifier with three components correctly differentiates three types of geometries with different surface properties, resulting in the best performance (100%) in geometry differentiation. Parametric differentiation correctly identifies six different surface types of the same planar geometry, resulting, in the best surface differentiation rate (100%). However, this rate is not maintained with the inclusion of more surfaces. The results indicate that the geometrical properties of the targets are more distinctive than their surface properties, and surface recognition is the limiting factor in differentiation. The results demonstrate that simple IR sensors, when coupled with appropriate processing and recognition techniques, can be used to extract Substantially more information than such devices are commonly employed for. (c) 2007 Pattern Recognition Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
target differentiation
geornetry differentiation
surface differentiation
statistical pattern recognition
feature extraction
infrared sensors optical sensing
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
7.6
Papers:
1.3W
Citations:
4.5W
Organization
No organization information available

