.png){kind=icon}
Return
Terminating links between emission trading programs
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jeem.2015.03.003.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Links between emission trading programs are not immutable, as highlighted by New Jersey's exit from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative in 2011. This raises the question of what to do with existing permits that are banked for future use-choices that have consequences for market behavior in advance of, or upon speculation about, delinking. We consider two delinking policies. One differentiates banked permits by origin, the other treats banked permits the same. We describe the price behavior and relative cost-effectiveness of each policy. Treating permits differently generally leads to higher costs, and may lead to price divergence, even with only speculation about delinking. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Emissions trading
Linking
Delinking
Speculation
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
5.9
Papers:
2.6K
Citations:
1.2W
Organization
Cited Papers
ShareSave
ShareSaveLinking existing and proposed GHG emissions trading schemes in North America.png)
CLIMATE POLICY
CLIMATE POLICYIF5.2
PREAI
ShareSave
Causes of the EU ETS price drop: Recession, CDM, renewable policies or a bit of everything?-New evidenceENERGY POLICY
ENERGY POLICYIF9.2
PREAI
ShareSaveLinking emissions trading schemes for international aviation and shipping emissionsCLIMATE POLICY
CLIMATE POLICYIF5.2
PREAI
ShareSave
View more