arrow
Return

Testing and validating machine learning classifiers by metamorphic testing

delete2011-04-01
delete251
delete
OA
AI
X
Xiaoyuan Xie *
J
Joshua W. K. Ho
C
Christian Murphy
G
Gail E. Kaiser
B
Baowen Xu
T
Tsong Yueh Chen
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.920delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Machine learning algorithms have provided core functionality to many application domains - such as bioinformatics, computational linguistics, etc. However, it is difficult to detect faults in such applications because often there is no test oracle to verify the correctness of the computed outputs. To help address the software quality, in this paper we present a technique for testing the implementations of machine learning classification algorithms which support such applications. Our approach is based on the technique metamorphic testing, which has been shown to be effective to alleviate the oracle problem. Also presented include a case study on a real-world machine learning application framework, and a discussion of how programmers implementing machine learning algorithms can avoid the common pitfalls discovered in our study. We also conduct mutation analysis and cross-validation, which reveal that our method has high effectiveness in killing mutants, and that observing expected cross-validation result alone is not sufficiently effective to detect faults in a supervised classification program. The effectiveness of metamorphic testing is further confirmed by the detection of real faults in a popular open-source classification program. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Metamorphic testing
Machine learning
Test oracle
Oracle problem
Validation
Verification
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Journal of Systems and Software cover
Journal of Systems and Software
IF:
4.1
Papers:
5.4K
Citations:
8.4K

Organization

H
Harvard University
Scholars:
26.5W
Papers: 22.0W
Citations: 28.7W
S
Swinburne University of Technology
Scholars:
9.3K
Papers: 1.2W
Citations: 2.0W
H
Harvard Medical School
Scholars:
6.5W
Papers: 4.8W
Citations: 91
researcher View more organizations