1
Return

The double-edged nature of antibody bivalency: mathematical and experimental analysis of cell surface antigen occupancy and opsonization

delete2026-06-03
delete0
delete
OA
AI
L
Luke Heirene *
J
James Lodge
M
Marina Fedorova
R
Ross Gauntlett *
J
Joanna Cordy
Z
Zahra Rattray
H
Helen Byrne *
E
Eamonn Gaffney
J
James W. T. Yates
DOI:10.1080/19420862.2026.2681843delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Monoclonal antibodies are bivalent molecules and are thus able to engage two antigens concurrently, a property termed avidity. The therapeutic efficacy of an antibody drug can be broadly defined as a consequence of either antigen occupancy or target cell opsonization. Therefore, depending on the intended mechanism of action, avid engagement of a therapeutic antibody may be desirable in order to attain high antigen occupancy and consequent antagonism. In some cases, such as target cell opsonization and Fc-mediated cytotoxicity, avidity may limit efficacy when antigens are occupied with fewer antibodies per cell. In this study, we utilized a mathematical model of antibody-antigen binding to identify conditions under which avidity hinders or enhances therapeutic potential. We calibrated the model with in vitro assays exploring the binding of a bivalent and monovalent panel of anti-PD-1 antibodies with a range of affinities, against cell lines with a range of target densities. In calibrating the model to the in vitro binding data, we observed an affinity-dependent discrepancy between experimentally observed and model-predicted cell binding that we hypothesize arises due to unavoidable assay limitations. The calibrated model was then reused to correct for the assay bias and to generate refined estimates for on-cell antibody binding. The predictions generated by this model for the influence of avidity on cell surface receptor engagement with therapeutic antibodies may guide strategies for their structural engineering and dosing.
Keywords:
Antibody
avidity
flow cytometry
mathematical model

Journal

mAbs cover
mAbs
IF:
7.3
Papers:
1.8K
Citations:
7.2K

Organization

G
glaxosmithkline
Scholars:
552
Papers: 174
Citations: 0
G
GSK
Scholars:
942
Papers: 268
Citations: 35
U
university of oxford
Scholars:
9.6W
Papers: 8.5W
Citations: 137
U
University of Strathclyde
Scholars:
1.2K
Papers: 601
Citations: 1.3W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers