arrow
Return

The Introduction

delete2025-12-01
delete0
PRE
AI
C
Chakrabarti, Pratik *
DOI:10.1086/738223delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The question for this Focus Section, is deep history white, is posed by the fact that deep time is predominantly derived from the writings of European savants from the eighteenth century. Yet, as this issue shows, these concepts are often used to depict the histories of people, their livelihoods, and landscapes, which are situated beyond Western Europe and its conceptual frames of deep history, in West Asia, Australia, Africa, and S & aacute;pmi. These peoples and regions often bear the political and economic consequences of deep time through displacement from land, memories, and stories. Deep history identified the historical imagination in the European study of the earth's histories. This issue asks if that particular genealogy is white. This whiteness is both at the level of the people who enjoyed and continue to exercise the right to practice and define that discipline as well at the level of its epistemological hegemony in obscuring other imaginations of the past. This Focus Section brings together scholarship from the leading experts and emerging scholars on these issues.
Keywords:
deep history
whiteness
epistemology
colonialism
historical imagination

Journal

I
Isis
IF:
0.9
Papers:
87
Citations:
0

Organization

U
university of houston system
Scholars:
1.4W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 16
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None
err2018-11-01
err0
PREAI
errKathryn Yusoff
errShare
errSave
no more