arrow
Return

The neuroconnectionist research programme

delete2023-05-30
delete49
delete
OA
AI
A
Adrien Doerig *
R
Rowan P. Sommers
K
Katja Seeliger
B
Blake A. Richards
J
Jenann Ismael
G
Grace W. Lindsay
K
Konrad P. Körding
T
Talia Konkle
V
van Gerven, Marcel A. J.
N
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
T
Tim C. Kietzmann
DOI:10.1038/s41583-023-00705-wdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Artificial neural networks are being widely used to model behavioural and neural data. In this Perspective article, Doerig et al. present neuroconnectionism as a Lakatosian research programme using artificial neural networks as a computational language for expressing falsifiable theories and hypotheses about the brain computations underlying cognition. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) inspired by biology are beginning to be widely used to model behavioural and neural data, an approach we call 'neuroconnectionism'. ANNs have been not only lauded as the current best models of information processing in the brain but also criticized for failing to account for basic cognitive functions. In this Perspective article, we propose that arguing about the successes and failures of a restricted set of current ANNs is the wrong approach to assess the promise of neuroconnectionism for brain science. Instead, we take inspiration from the philosophy of science, and in particular from Lakatos, who showed that the core of a scientific research programme is often not directly falsifiable but should be assessed by its capacity to generate novel insights. Following this view, we present neuroconnectionism as a general research programme centred around ANNs as a computational language for expressing falsifiable theories about brain computation. We describe the core of the programme, the underlying computational framework and its tools for testing specific neuroscientific hypotheses and deriving novel understanding. Taking a longitudinal view, we review past and present neuroconnectionist projects and their responses to challenges and argue that the research programme is highly progressive, generating new and otherwise unreachable insights into the workings of the brain.
Keywords:
DEEP NEURAL-NETWORKS
HIERARCHICAL-MODELS
OBJECT RECOGNITION
PREFRONTAL CORTEX
BRAIN
REPRESENTATIONS
FRAMEWORK
DYNAMICS
SPARSE
LEVEL

Journal

Nature Reviews Neuroscience cover
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
IF:
26.7
Papers:
4.0K
Citations:
4.8W

Organization

C
Columbia University
Scholars:
7.1W
Papers: 6.4W
Citations: 263
N
New York University
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 3.9W
Citations: 5.8W
U
university of pennsylvania
Scholars:
9.2W
Papers: 7.8W
Citations: 153
J
Johns Hopkins University
Scholars:
10.2W
Papers: 8.8W
Citations: 13.0W
M
Max Planck Society
Scholars:
8.2W
Papers: 7.7W
Citations: 3.3W
M
McGill University
Scholars:
5.5W
Papers: 4.9W
Citations: 7.0W
U
University Osnabruck
Scholars:
3.0K
Papers: 2.6K
Citations: 15
R
Radboud University Nijmegen
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 3.4W
Citations: 5.4W
researcher View more organizations