.png){kind=icon}
Return
Thinking about need
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1007/s10888-025-09698-1.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
We examine the role of need satisfaction in non-comparative justice ratings of endowments with goods. As normative approaches, we discuss utilitarianism, prioritarianism, and three versions of sufficientarianism. Using a vignette experiment with 109 participants, we elicit the participants’ justice ratings of endowments with living space and estimate their justice evaluation functions. We show that a need context increases the prevalence of prioritarianistic and sufficientarianistic justice ratings. Moreover, a need threshold also changes the utilitarians’ justice evaluation functions significantly.
Keywords:
Basic Needs
Justice Principles
Prioritarianism
Sufficientarianism
Utilitarianism
Vignette Experiment
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
2.4
Papers:
652
Citations:
1.3K
Organization
View more organizations
Cited Papers
.png){kind=icon}
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSave View more