arrow
Return

Time to rethink academic publishing: the peer reviewer crisis

delete2023-12-19
delete7
delete
OA
AI
C
Carolina Tropini *
B
B. Brett Finlay
M
Mark Nichter
M
Melissa K. Melby
J
Jessica L. Metcalf
M
Maria Gloria Domínguez-Bello
L
Liping Zhao
M
Margaret McFall‐Ngai
N
Naama Geva‐Zatorsky
K
Katherine R. Amato
E
Eduardo A. Undurraga
H
Hendrik N. Poinar
J
Jack A. Gilbert *
B
Boothroyd, John C.
DOI:10.1128/mbio.01091-23delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
There is concern that the time taken to publish academic papers in microbiological science has significantly increased in recent years. While the data do not specifically support this, evidence suggests that editors are having to invite more and more reviewers to identify those willing to perform peer review.
Keywords:
peer review
reviewer rewards
artificial intelligence
early career researcher
peer review crisis
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

mBio cover
mBio
IF:
4.7
Papers:
8.5K
Citations:
3.7W

Organization

C
Colorado State University System
Scholars:
1.3W
Papers: 1.0W
Citations: 3
R
Rappaport Faculty of Medicine
Scholars:
2.7K
Papers: 2.0K
Citations: 0
R
rutgers university new brunswick
Scholars:
2.3W
Papers: 1.9W
Citations: 32
R
rutgers university system
Scholars:
4.1W
Papers: 3.6W
Citations: 53
C
canadian institute for advanced research (cifar)
Scholars:
551
Papers: 373
Citations: 1
researcher View more organizations