1
Return

Top-Down Estimates of U.S. NOx Emissions Using TEMPO and TROPOMI NO2 Remote Sensing Observations With WRF-Chem/Chem-DART

delete2026-01-19
delete0
PRE
AI
C
Chia‐Hua Hsu *
D
Daven K. Henze
A
Arthur P. Mizzi
C
Colin Harkins
C
Congmeng Lyu
O
Owen R. Cooper
R
Rebecca H. Schwantes
J
Jian He
李萌 (Meng Li)
S
Siyuan Wang
C
Chelsea E. Stockwell
C
C. Warneke
A
Andrew W. Rollins
E
Eleanor M. Waxman
K
Kristen Zuraski
J
Jeff Peischl
S
Shobha Kondragunta
F
Fangjun Li
C
Chuanyu Xu
R
R. Bradley Pierce
G
Gonzalo González Abad
C
Caroline R. Nowlan
X
Xiong Liu
B
Brian McDonald *
DOI:10.1029/2025JD044223delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The operation of geostationary (GEO) instruments such as the Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO) provides unprecedented hourly nitrogen dioxide (NO2) observations compared to the once-daily data from a low-Earth orbit (LEO) platform like the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI). This study investigates the performance and challenges of using TEMPO versus TROPOMI measurements to constrain anthropogenic nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions. The accuracy of TEMPO and TROPOMI NO2 tropospheric columns are assessed using Pandora observations, finding a low bias of 9%–12.3% in TEMPO, and TROPOMI data during August 2023, while TEMPO midday and late afternoon observations are less of low bias. Top-down NOx emissions derived by midday TEMPO and TROPOMI data are generally consistent over urban areas, being 5%–20% lower than bottom-up emissions provided by the 2021 GReenhouse gas And Air Pollutants Emissions System (GRA2PES), and align with 2023 GRA2PES emissions, demonstrating the reliability of using satellite data for timely updates of bottom-up inventories. However, assimilating additional morning/late afternoon TEMPO data leads to the poorest top-down NOx emissions, likely resulting from larger negative measurement biases. NOx emission inversions effectively mitigate NOx overprediction, though the top-down NOx emissions might be over-corrected in urban cores. NOx emissions optimization also improves ozone forecasts by reducing the model's positive biases, especially when assimilating midday TEMPO data. Our study suggests that TEMPO midday observations provide better constraints on the magnitude and spatiotemporal variation of anthropogenic NOx emissions than TROPOMI, while morning TEMPO v3 data should be used cautiously due to potential negative impact on NOx emissions inversion.
Keywords:
emissions inversion
NOx emissions
remote sensing
TEMPO
TROPOMI

Journal

J
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
IF:
0
Papers:
437
Citations:
0

Organization

U
university of wisconsin madison
Scholars:
3.7W
Papers: 2.9W
Citations: 52
U
university of colorado
Scholars:
2.6K
Papers: 1.3K
Citations: 0
H
Harvard and Smithsonian
Scholars:
398
Papers: 279
Citations: 137
S
south dakota state university
Scholars:
292
Papers: 152
Citations: 0
N
noaa
Scholars:
144
Papers: 77
Citations: 0
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers