.png){kind=icon}
Return
Toward the third generation artificial intelligence
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1007/s11432-021-3449-x.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
There have been two competing paradigms in artificial intelligence (AI) development ever since its birth in 1956, i.e., symbolism and connectionism (or sub-symbolism). While symbolism dominated AI research by the end of 1980s, connectionism gained momentum in the 1990s and is gradually displacing symbolism. This paper considers symbolism as the first generation of AI and connectionism as the second generation. However, each of these two paradigms simulates the human mind from only one perspective. AI cannot achieve true human behaviors by relying on only one paradigm. In order to develop novel AI technologies that are safe, reliable, and extensible, it is necessary to establish a new explainable and robust AI theory. To this end, this paper looks toward developing a third generation artificial intelligence by combining the current paradigms.
Keywords:
artificial intelligence
symbolism
connectionism
dual-space model
single-space model
triple-space model
Journal
IF:
7.6
Papers:
4.9K
Citations:
8.9K
Organization
Cited Papers
ShareSaveIDO as a drug target for cancer immunotherapy: recent developments in IDO inhibitors discovery.png)
RSC Advances
RSC AdvancesIF0
PREAI
ShareSaveShareSaveDistinct pattern of c-fos mRNA expression after systemic and intra-accumbens amphetamine and MK-801Neuroscience
NeuroscienceIF0
PREAI
ShareSaveShareSaveCalifornia Coastal Upwelling Onset Variability: Cross-Shore and Bottom-Up Propagation in the Planktonic EcosystemPLoS ONE
OAAI
PLoS ONEIF0
OAAIShareSaveShareSave
View more