arrow
Return

Toward Understanding and Evaluating Structural Node Embeddings

delete2021-11-15
delete14
PRE
AI
J
Junchen Jin *
M
Mark Heimann
D
Di Jin
D
Danai Koutra
DOI:10.1145/3481639delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
While most network embedding techniques model the proximity between nodes in a network, recently there has been significant interest in structural embeddings that are based on node equivalences, a notion rooted in sociology: equivalences or positions are collections of nodes that have similar roles-i.e., similar functions, ties or interactions with nodes in other positions-irrespective of their distance or reachability in the network. Unlike the proximity-based methods that are rigorously evaluated in the literature, the evaluation of structural embeddings is less mature. It relies on small synthetic or real networks with labels that are not perfectly defined, and its connection to sociological equivalences has hitherto been vague and tenuous. With new node embedding methods being developed at a breakneck pace, proper evaluation, and systematic characterization of existing approaches will be essential to progress. To fill in this gap, we set out to understand what types of equivalences structural embeddings capture. We are the first to contribute rigorous intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation methodology for structural embeddings, along with carefully-designed, diverse datasets of varying sizes. We observe a number of different evaluation variables that can lead to different results (e.g., choice of similarity measure, classifier, and label definitions). We find that degree distributions within nodes' local neighborhoods can lead to simple yet effective baselines in their own right and guide the future development of structural embedding. We hope that our findings can influence the design of further node embedding methods and also pave the way for more comprehensive and fair evaluation of structural embedding methods.
Keywords:
Graph mining
node embedding
role discovery

Journal

ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data cover
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
IF:
4.8
Papers:
1.3K
Citations:
4.4K

Organization

U
university of michigan system
Scholars:
9.1W
Papers: 8.6W
Citations: 133
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Insurance activity and economic performance: Fresh evidence from asymmetric panel causality tests
err2018-10-24
err0
errOAAI
errAbdulnasser Hatemi‐J; Chi‐Chuan Lee; Chien‐Chiang Lee; Rangan Gupta
errShare
errSave
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
errShare
errSave
Optical and magneto-optical properties and magnetorefractive effect in metal-insulator CoFe–Al2O3 granular films
err2005-08-19
err0
PREAI
errV. G. Kravets; L. V. Poperenko; I. V. Yurgelevych; A. M. Pogorily; A. F. Kravets
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a practical comprehensive literature review
err2020-10-18
err0
PREAI
errFrancisco Montenegro; Luis Unigarro; Gustavo Paredes; Tatiana Moya; Ana Romero; Liliana Torres; Juan Carlos López; Fernando Esteban Jara González; Gustavo Del Pozo; Andrés López-Cortés; Ana M Diaz; Eduardo Vasconez; Doménica Cevallos-Robalino; Alex Lister; Esteban Ortiz-Prado
errShare
errSave
researcher View more