1
Return

Tracking thermophysical drift improves latent thermal-runaway risk evaluation in lithium iron phosphate energy storage batteries under low-rate overcharge

delete2026-07-29
delete0
PRE
AI
G
Guiqi Hou
X
Xuyang Wu *
K
Kaifei Tu
X
Xiaoqing Zhang
Q
Qing Liu
P
Pei Wang
Y
Yong Tang
W
Wei Yuan *
DOI:10.1016/j.ensm.2026.105422delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Detecting latent overcharge-induced instability prior to observable thermal runaway (TR) during low-rate overcharge in lithium iron phosphate energy storage batteries remains a critical challenge. Thermophysical-parameter drift and safety-boundary evolution can obscure early thermal evolution and render traditional static criteria insufficient. Here, we propose a risk-scoring assessment framework integrating a physics-informed neural network with adaptive filtering. By embedding a thermodynamic model as a physical constraint, this approach improves the robustness of parameter inversion under strongly nonlinear thermal conditions. It accurately reconstructs core temperatures to compensate for shell temperature observation lag. We further develop a dynamic risk evaluation scheme utilizing parameter uncertainty propagation. Validation at 0.5 C demonstrates that the core-temperature RMSE was 2.2 °C, reducing RMSE by 80.0% relative to static-adaptive extended Kalman filter. Comparing the 0.1 C to 0.5 C overcharge conditions, the normalized safe observation window was lower at 0.5 C (53.5%) than at 0.1 C (81.8%) of the overcharge duration preceding the 6 V experimental abuse-test cutoff. This work is expected to provide a physically interpretable basis for developing active safety management strategies in battery management systems for advanced energy storage applications.

Journal

Energy Storage Materials cover
Energy Storage Materials
IF:
20.2
Papers:
5.6K
Citations:
6.3W

Organization

S
shenzhen university
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 3.4W
Citations: 72
S
south china university of technology
Scholars:
6.6W
Papers: 5.0W
Citations: 85
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers