arrow
Return

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Nonsevere Aortic Stenosis

delete2023-05-01
delete22
delete
OA
AI
S
Sebastian Ludwig
N
Niklas Schofer
M
Mohamed Abdel‐Wahab
M
Marina Ureña
G
Guillaume Jean
M
Matthias Renker
C
Christian W. Hamm
H
Hölger Thiele
B
Bernard Iung
J
Joris F. Ooms
M
Maya Wiessman
N
Nils Sofus Borg Mogensen
B
Benjamin Longère
N
Nils Perrin
W
Walid Ben Ali
A
Augustin Coisne
J
Jordi Sanchez Dahl
N
Nicolas M. Van Mieghem
R
Ran Kornowski
W
Won‐Keun Kim
M
Marie‐Annick Clavel *
DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012768delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
BACKGROUND: The potential benefit of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with nonsevere aortic stenosis (AS) and heart failure is controversial. This study aimed to assess outcomes of patients with nonsevere low-gradient AS (LGAS) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing TAVR or medical management. METHODS: Patients undergoing TAVR for LGAS and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (<50%) were included in a multinational registry. True-severe low-gradient AS (TS-LGAS) and pseudo-severe low-gradient AS (PS-LGAS) were classified according to computed tomography-derived aortic valve calcification thresholds. A medical control group with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and moderate AS or PS-LGAS was used (Medical-Mod). Adjusted outcomes between all groups were compared. Among patients with nonsevere AS (moderate or PS-LGAS), outcomes after TAVR and medical therapy were compared using propensity score-matching. RESULTS: A total of 706 LGAS patients undergoing TAVR (TS-LGAS, N=527; PS-LGAS, N=179) and 470 Medical-Mod patients were included. After adjustment, both TAVR groups showed superior survival compared with Medical-Mod patients (all P<0.001), while no difference was found between TS-LGAS and PS-LGAS TAVR patients (P=0.96). After propensity score-matching among patients with nonsevere AS, PS-LGAS TAVR patients showed superior 2-year overall (65.4%) and cardiovascular survival (80.4%) compared with Medical-Mod patients (48.8% and 58.5%, both P <= 0.004). In a multivariable analysis including all patients with nonsevere AS, TAVR was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.27-0.55]; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with nonsevere AS and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, TAVR represents a major predictor of superior survival. These results reinforce the need for randomized-controlled trials comparing TAVR versus medical management in heart failure patients with nonsevere AS. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04914481.
Keywords:
heart failure
left ventricular dysfunction
prognosis
propensity score
transcatheter aortic valve replacement
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Circulation-Cardiovascular Interventions cover
Circulation-Cardiovascular Interventions
IF:
7.4
Papers:
2.4K
Citations:
7.3K

Organization

E
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Scholars:
4.6W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 2.4W
L
laval university
Scholars:
2.5W
Papers: 2.2W
Citations: 96
G
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research
Scholars:
4.5K
Papers: 3.2K
Citations: 8
K
kerckhoff clinic
Scholars:
1.2K
Papers: 910
Citations: 3
L
Leipzig University
Scholars:
2.0W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 17
U
Universite Paris Cite
Scholars:
8.9W
Papers: 6.3W
Citations: 604
H
hopital universitaire bichat-claude bernard - aphp
Scholars:
3.3K
Papers: 2.7K
Citations: 6
A
assistance publique hopitaux paris (aphp)
Scholars:
6.8W
Papers: 5.3W
Citations: 57
T
Tel Aviv University
Scholars:
3.7W
Papers: 3.0W
Citations: 3.6W
E
Erasmus MC
Scholars:
2.9W
Papers: 2.5W
Citations: 3.4W
researcher View more organizations