arrow
Return

Transforming the Future of Surgeon-Scientists

delete2023-11-02
delete4
delete
OA
AI
D
Daniela P. Ladner
A
Allan M. Goldstein
T
Timothy R. Billiar
A
Andrew M. Cameron
D
Darren R. Carpizo
D
Daniel I. Chu
C
Craig M. Coopersmith
R
Ronald P. DeMatteo
S
Sandy Feng
K
Katherine Gallagher
W
William E. Gillanders
B
Brajesh K. Lal
G
Gerald S. Lipshutz
A
Annie Liu
R
Ronald V. Maier
E
Elizabeth A. Mittendorf
A
Arden M. Morris
J
Jason K. Sicklick
O
Omaida C. Velázquez
B
Bryan A. Whitson
L
Lee G. Wilke
S
Sam S. Yoon
M
Martha A. Zeiger
D
Diana L. Farmer
E
E. Shelley Hwang *
DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006148delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Objective:To create a blueprint for surgical department leaders, academic institutions, and funding agencies to optimally support surgeon-scientists.Background:Scientific contributions by surgeons have been transformative across many medical disciplines. Surgeon-scientists provide a distinct approach and mindset toward key scientific questions. However, lack of institutional support, pressure for increased clinical productivity, and growing administrative burden are major challenges for the surgeon-scientist, as is the time-consuming nature of surgical training and practice.Methods:An American Surgical Association Research Sustainability Task Force was created to outline a blueprint for sustainable science in surgery. Leaders from top NIH-sponsored departments of surgery engaged in video and in-person meetings between January and April 2023. A strength, weakness, opportunities, threats analysis was performed, and workgroups focused on the roles of surgeons, the department and institutions, and funding agencies. Results:Taskforce recommendations: (1) SURGEONS: Growth mindset: identifying research focus, long-term planning, patience/tenacity, team science, collaborations with disparate experts; Skill set: align skills and research, fill critical skill gaps, develop team leadership skills; DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY (DOS): (2) MENTORSHIP: Chair: mentor-mentee matching/regular meetings/accountability, review of junior faculty progress, mentorship training requirement, recognition of mentorship (eg, relative value unit equivalent, awards; Mentor: dedicated time, relevant scientific expertise, extramural funding, experience and/or trained as mentor, trusted advisor; Mentee: enthusiastic/eager, proactive, open to feedback, clear about goals; (3) FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY: diversification of research portfolio, identification of matching funding sources, departmental resource awards (eg, T-/P-grants), leveraging of institutional resources, negotiation of formalized/formulaic funds flow investment from academic medical center toward science, philanthropy; (4) STRUCTURAL/STRATEGIC SUPPORT: Structural: grants administrative support, biostats/bioinformatics support, clinical trial and research support, regulatory support, shared departmental laboratory space/equipment; Strategic: hiring diverse surgeon-scientist/scientists faculty across DOS, strategic faculty retention/ recruitment, philanthropy, career development support, progress tracking, grant writing support, DOS-wide research meetings, regular DOS strategic research planning; (5) COMMUNITY AND CULTURE: Community: right mix of faculty, connection surgeon with broad scientific community; Culture: building research infrastructure, financial support for research, projecting importance of research (awards, grand rounds, shoutouts); (6) THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS: Foundation: research space co-location, flexible start-up packages, courses/mock study section, awards, diverse institutional mentorship teams; Nurture: institutional infrastructure, funding (eg, endowed chairs), promotion friendly toward surgeon-scientists, surgeon-scientists in institutional leadership positions; Expectations: RVU target relief, salary gap funding, competitive starting salaries, longitudinal salary strategy; (7) THE ROLE OF FUNDING AGENCIES: change surgeon research training paradigm, offer alternate awards to K-awards, increasing salary cap to reflect market reality, time extension for surgeon early-stage investigator status, surgeon representation on study section, focused award strategies for professional societies/foundations.Conclusions:Authentic recommitment from surgeon leaders with intentional and ambitious actions from institutions, corporations, funders, and society is essential in order to reap the essential benefits of surgeon-scientists toward advancements of science.
Keywords:
CAREER-DEVELOPMENT AWARDS
SUCCESS
SCIENCE
US

Journal

Annals of Surgery cover
Annals of Surgery
IF:
6.4
Papers:
1.1W
Citations:
5.5W

Organization

M
Massachusetts General Hospital
Scholars:
3.4W
Papers: 2.6W
Citations: 8.6W
University of Alabama System cover
University of Alabama System
Scholars:
4.2W
Papers: 3.7W
Citations: 68
U
University of Alabama Birmingham
Scholars:
2.1W
Papers: 1.8W
Citations: 29
U
university of california san francisco
Scholars:
5.2W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 67
H
Harvard University
Scholars:
26.2W
Papers: 21.9W
Citations: 28.7W
H
harvard university medical affiliates
Scholars:
5.7W
Papers: 4.5W
Citations: 36
U
University of Washington
Scholars:
8.0W
Papers: 7.0W
Citations: 12.5W
U
university of pennsylvania
Scholars:
9.2W
Papers: 7.8W
Citations: 153
U
University of Rochester
Scholars:
2.6W
Papers: 2.1W
Citations: 2.2W
U
university of california los angeles
Scholars:
5.3W
Papers: 4.2W
Citations: 89
J
Johns Hopkins University
Scholars:
10.2W
Papers: 8.8W
Citations: 13.0W
U
University of Pittsburgh
Scholars:
4.5W
Papers: 3.6W
Citations: 7.1W
P
pennsylvania commonwealth system of higher education (pcshe)
Scholars:
12.8W
Papers: 11.7W
Citations: 177
University System of Maryland cover
University System of Maryland
Scholars:
6.4W
Papers: 5.6W
Citations: 113
W
washington university (wustl)
Scholars:
5.4W
Papers: 4.5W
Citations: 70
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.2W
Papers: 33.6W
Citations: 6.6K
E
Emory University
Scholars:
5.0W
Papers: 4.2W
Citations: 5.7W
U
University of Michigan
Scholars:
6.4W
Papers: 5.3W
Citations: 124
H
Harvard Medical School
Scholars:
6.5W
Papers: 4.8W
Citations: 91
U
university of michigan system
Scholars:
9.0W
Papers: 8.6W
Citations: 133
U
University of Maryland Baltimore
Scholars:
1.8W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 2.5W
N
Northwestern University
Scholars:
6.1W
Papers: 5.2W
Citations: 3.9K
researcher View more organizations