Return
Two-step algorithm-based Clostridioides difficile testing as a tool for antibiotic stewardship
DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2023.02.008.png)
Abstract
En 中文
Objectives: Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) can be challenging due to high colonization rates. Unlike PCR-only testing, two-step algorithm testing (that includes toxin and PCR) may help differentiate colonization from active infection, but it is unknown if this type of testing impacts treat-ment decisions. We examined the association between changing CDI diagnostic methods, the way the testing results were displayed, and the rates of CDI-specific treatment.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of positive C. difficile cases over 2 years, a year preceding and following our institution's transition from PCR to two-step testing. During the PCR period, results were displayed in the electronic medical record as positive'. In the two-step period, positive results were either displayed as 'likely colonized' or 'toxin positive'. Rates of CDI-specific therapy and adverse patient outcomes (30-day mortality and intensive care unit admission) were compared among the three groups. Results: A total of 610 patients had positive results over the study period. Of the 354 patients in the PCR group, 329 (93%) were treated with CDI-specific therapy. Of the 142 patients in the likely colonized group, 59 (42%) were treated. All 114 patients in the toxin-positive group were treated. Multivariate analysis of patients who were PCR positive or likely colonized showed that tests sent in the two-step era were less likely to be associated with treatment for CDI (odds ratio 0.05, 95% CI 0.03-0.09).Discussion: We found a correlation between changing the type of test and the way the results were displayed and reduction in CDI-specific antibiotic use without restricting clinician diagnostic ordering.
Keywords:
Antimicrobial stewardship
Clostridium dif fi cile
Diagnostic stewardship
Electronic medical record
Journal
IF:
8.5
Papers:
8.7K
Citations:
2.6W

