.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Two-step learning for crowdsourcing data classification
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1007/s11042-022-12793-4.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Crowdsourcing learning (Bonald and Combes 2016; Dawid and Skene, J R Stat Soc: Series C (Appl Stat), 28(1):20-28 1979; Karger et al. 2011; Li et al, IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 28(9):2296-2319 2016; Liu et al. 2012; Schlagwein and Bjorn-Andersen, J Assoc Inform Syst, 15(11):3 2014; Zhang et al. 2014) plays an increasingly important role in the era of big data (Liu et al., IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern: Syst, 48(12): 451-2461, 2017; Zhang et al. 2014) due to its ability to easily solve large-scale data annotations (Musen et al., J Amer Med Informs Assoc, 22(6):1148-1152 2015). However, in the process of crowdsourcing learning, the uneven knowledge level of workers often leads to low accuracy of the label after marking, which brings difficulties to the subsequent processing (Edwards and Teddy 2013) and analysis of crowdsourcing data. In order to solve this problem, this paper proposes a two-step learning crowdsourced data classification algorithm, which optimizes the original label data by simultaneously considering the two issues of different worker abilities and the similarity between crowdsourced data (Kasikci et al. 2013) samples, so as to get more accurate label data. The two-step learning algorithm mainly includes two steps. Firstly, the worker's ability to label different samples is obtained by constructing and training the worker's ability model, and then the similarity between samples is calculated by the cosine measurement method (Muflikhah and Baharudin 2009), and finally the original label data is optimized by combining the above two results. The experimental results also show that the two-step learning classification algorithm proposed in this article has achieved better experimental results than the comparison algorithm.
Keywords:
Crowdsourcing learning
Similarity learning
Classification
Majority voting
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
3
Papers:
1.9W
Citations:
3.2W