.png){kind=icon}
Return
Uneven Development Redux
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1080/13563467.2011.542804.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
I am very grateful to all of the contributors to this symposium - Emily Eaton; Julie Guthman; Nik Heynen, Peter Hossler and Andrew Herod; and Mazen Labban - for their generosity, not just in taking time to pass comment on Uneven Development (UD) but to do so with such critical magnanimity. I will resist the temptation to respond to most of the points but let me begin with a couple of engagements addressed directly to the comments, before taking a wider view. This article briefly picks up on several comments made in this exchange concerning the book Uneven Development, then raises several issues that emerge from the original arguments and extend the theory in light of empirical shifts over the last quarter of a century.
Keywords:
uneven development
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
4.6
Papers:
1.1K
Citations:
3.3K
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
No cited papers available