.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Unpacking the black box - a questionnaire study of how medical journals identify and manage conflicts of interest of editors and peer reviewers
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
C
H
C
I
L
A
A
DOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112376.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
• Majority of medical journals had procedures in place to identify editors’ financial and non-financial interests, and about half did not allow them. • Only half of journals instructed peer reviewers on what to do if they had conflicts of interest; fewer required disclosures in review reports, and verification was often not used by journals. • Procedures for identifying and managing undisclosed interests were often lacking, or respondents were unfamiliar with practices. • Journal practices were often discordant with the journal policy.
Keywords:
Conflicts of interest
clinical research
publishing
editorial management
editors
peer review
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
5.2
Papers:
8.4K
Citations:
4.3W
Organization
Cited Papers