.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Unsupervised Semantic Similarity Computation between Terms Using Web Documents
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1109/TKDE.2009.193.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
In this work, Web-based metrics that compute the semantic similarity between words or terms are presented and compared with the state of the art. Starting from the fundamental assumption that similarity of context implies similarity of meaning, relevant Web documents are downloaded via a Web search engine and the contextual information of words of interest is compared (context-based similarity metrics). The proposed algorithms work automatically, do not require any human-annotated knowledge resources, e.g., ontologies, and can be generalized and applied to different languages. Context-based metrics are evaluated both on the Charles-Miller data set and on a medical term data set. It is shown that context-based similarity metrics significantly outperform co-occurrence-based metrics, in terms of correlation with human judgment, for both tasks. In addition, the proposed unsupervised context-based similarity computation algorithms are shown to be competitive with the state-of-the-art supervised semantic similarity algorithms that employ language-specific knowledge resources. Specifically, context-based metrics achieve correlation scores of up to 0.88 and 0.74 for the Charles-Miller and medical data sets, respectively. The effect of stop word filtering is also investigated for word and term similarity computation. Finally, the performance of context-based term similarity metrics is evaluated as a function of the number of Web documents used and for various feature weighting schemes.
Keywords:
Natural language processing
semantic similarity
Web search
ontologies
knowledge acquisition
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
10.4
Papers:
6.8K
Citations:
3.2W