1
Return

Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 24: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2026

delete2026-07-06
delete0
delete
OA
AI
E
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
A
Ana Allende
A
Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez
V
Valeria Bortolaia
S
Sara Bover-Cid
A
Alessandra De Cesare
W
Wietske Dohmen
L
Laurent Guillier
L
Liesbeth Jacxsens
M
Maarten Nauta
L
Lapo Mughini-Gras
J
Jakob Ottoson
L
Luisa Peixe
F
Fernando Perez-Rodriguez
P
Panagiotis Skandamis
E
Elisabetta Suffredini
M
Marianne Chemaly
P
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
P
Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez
M
Miguel Prieto Maradona
A
Amparo Querol
L
Lolke Sijtsma
I
Ingvar Sundh
F
Fulvio Barizzone
M
Marta Bisaschi
S
Sandra Correia
L
Lieve Herman
DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10155delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) process was developed to provide a harmonised safety assessment approach to support EFSA Scientific Panels and Units. The QPS approach assesses the taxonomic identity, body of knowledge and safety of microorganisms intentionally added to the food and feed chain. Safety concerns identified for a Taxonomic Unit (TU) are, where possible, reflected by ‘qualifications’ that should be assessed at the strain level by EFSA's Scientific Panels. During the period covered by this Statement, no new information warranted changes to the status of previously recommended QPS TUs. Of the 99 microorganisms notified to EFSA between October 2025 and March 2026 (47 as feed additives, 32 as food enzymes or additives, 5 as novel foods and 15 as plant protection products), 85 were not evaluated. These latter included 22 filamentous fungi, 6 Escherichia coli and 2 streptomyces (all excluded from the QPS evaluation), and 55 already present on the QPS list. Of the remaining 14 notifications, corresponding to 11 TUs, 7 were already assessed in the previous QPS 3-years cycle Bacillus thuringiensis, Ensifer adhaerens, Enterococcus lactis, Heyndrickxia faecalis, Hyphomicrobium denitrificans, Microbacterium foliorum and Papiliotrema terrestris and 4 TUs were assessed for the first time: Listeria innocua, Pseudomonas protegens, Lactococcus cremoris (new species, previously a subspecies, which was part of the QPS species Lactococcus lactis) and Companilactobacillus pabuli (new species ‘split’ of a previous QPS species Companilactobacillus farciminis). L. cremoris, H. faecalis and C. pabuli are recommended for the QPS list, E. adhaerens also but only for production purposes. B. thuringiensis, E. lactis, P. protegens and L. innocua are not recommended for the QPS list due to safety concerns. B. thuringiensis is excluded from further QPS assessment. M. foliorum, P. terrestris and H. denitrificans are not recommended for the QPS list due to the limited body of knowledge.
Keywords:
Bacillus thuringiensis
Companilactobacillus pabuli
Ensifer adhaerens
Enterococcus lactis
Heyndrickxia faecalis
Hyphomicrobium denitrificans
Lactococcus cremoris
Listeria innocua
Microbacterium foliorum
Papiliotrema terrestris
Pseudomonas protegens
QPS
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

EFSA Journal cover
EFSA Journal
IF:
3.3
Papers:
4.1K
Citations:
1.9W

Organization

No organization information available
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers