.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
US-based Sequential Algorithm Integrating an AI Model for Advanced Liver Fibrosis Screening
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1148/radiol.231461.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Background: Noninvasive tests can be used to screen patients with chronic liver disease for advanced liver fibrosis; however, the use of single tests may not be adequate. Purpose: To construct sequential clinical algorithms that include a US deep learning (DL) model and compare their ability to predict advanced liver fibrosis with that of other noninvasive tests. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients with a history of chronic liver disease or unexplained abnormal liver function test results who underwent B -mode US of the liver between January 2014 and September 2022 at three health care facilities. A US -based DL network (FIB -Net) was trained on US images to predict whether the shear -wave elastography (SWE) value was 8.7 kPa or higher, indicative of advanced fibrosis. In the internal and external test sets, a two-step algorithm (Two-step#1) using the Fibrosis -4 Index (FIB -4) followed by FIB -Net and a three -step algorithm (Three-step#1) using FIB -4 followed by FIB -Net and SWE were used to simulate screening scenarios where liver stiffness measurements were not or were available, respectively. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated using liver biopsy as the reference standard and compared between FIB -4, SWE, FIB -Net, and European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines (ie, FIB -4 followed by SWE), along with sequential algorithms. Results: The training, validation, and test data sets included 3067 (median age, 42 years [IQR, 33-53 years]; 2083 male), 1599 (median age, 41 years [IQR, 33-51 years]; 1124 male), and 1228 (median age, 44 years [IQR, 33-55 years]; 741 male) patients, respectively. FIB -Net obtained a noninferior specificity with a margin of 5% ( P < .001) compared with SWE (80% vs 82%). The Two-step#1 algorithm showed higher specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) than FIB -4 (specificity, 79% vs 57%; PPV, 44% vs 32%) while reducing unnecessary referrals by 42%. The Three-step#1 algorithm had higher specificity and PPV compared with European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines (specificity, 94% vs 88%; PPV, 73% vs 64%) while reducing unnecessary referrals by 35%. Conclusion: A sequential algorithm combining FIB -4 and a US DL model showed higher diagnostic accuracy and improved referral management for all -cause advanced liver fibrosis compared with FIB -4 or the DL model alone.
Keywords:
SIMPLE NONINVASIVE INDEX
HEPATITIS-B
ELASTOGRAPHY
OUTCOMES
PREDICT