arrow
Return

Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review

delete2015-10-01
delete397
PRE
AI
P
Pengfei Wei *
Z
Zhenzhou Lü
J
Jingwen Song
DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.018delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Measuring variable importance for computational models or measured data is an important task in many applications. It has drawn our attention that the variable importance analysis (VIA) techniques were developed independently in many disciplines. We are strongly aware of the necessity to aggregate all the good practices in each discipline, and compare the relative merits of each method, so as to instruct the practitioners to choose the optimal methods to meet different analysis purposes, and to guide current research on VIA. To this end, all the good practices, including seven groups of methods, i.e., the difference-based variable importance measures (VIMs), parametric regression and related VIMs, nonparametric regression techniques, hypothesis test techniques, variance-based VIMs, moment-independent VIMs and graphic VIMs, are reviewed and compared with a numerical test example set in two situations (independent and dependent cases). For ease of use, the recommendations are provided for different types of applications, and packages as well as software for implementing these VIA techniques are collected. Prospects for future study of VIA techniques are also proposed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Variable importance analysis
Difference-based
Regression technique
Random forest
Variance-based
Moment-independent
Graphic variable importance measures
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

R
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
IF:
11
Papers:
9.0K
Citations:
4.2W

Organization

N
Northwestern Polytechnical University
Scholars:
4.6W
Papers: 3.7W
Citations: 5.3W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

A comparison of two sampling methods for global sensitivity analysis
err2012-05-01
err57
PREAI
errTarantola, Stefano; Becker, William; Zeitz, Dirk
errShare
errSave
Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic renal disease: Challenges of interventional treatment
err2021-03-01
err0
PREAI
errGerardo Sarno; Roberto Montalti; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Gianluca Rompianesi; Federico Tomassini; Emidio Scarpellini; Giuseppe De Simone; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Roberto Ivan Troisi
errShare
errSave
The time-course of threat processing in children: a temporal dissociation between selective attention and behavioral interference
err2012-05-01
err0
PREAI
errLidewij H. Wolters; Else de Haan; Leentje Vervoort; Sanne M. Hogendoorn; Frits Boer; Pier J.M. Prins
errShare
errSave
Analysis of computationally demanding models with continuous and categorical inputs
err2013-05-01
err31
PREAI
errStorlie, Curtis B.; Reich, Brian J.; Helton, Jon C.; Swiler, Laura P.; Sallaberry, Cedric J.
errShare
errSave
Global sensitivity measures from given data
err2013-05-01
err307
PREAI
errPlischke, Elmar; Borgonovo, Emanuele; Smith, Curtis L.
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Realisation of siloxane ionomers by mild oxidation of alkylmercaptosiloxanes
err1999-01-01
err0
PREAI
errPhilip J. Evans; Robert C. T. Slade; John R. Varcoe; Kevin E. Young
errShare
errSave
researcher View more