arrow
Return

Variable selection and inference strategies for multiple compositional regression

delete2024-05-01
delete0
PRE
AI
S
Sujin Lee
S
Sungkyu Jung *
DOI:10.1016/j.chemolab.2024.105121delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
An important problem in compositional data analysis is variable selection in linear regression models with compositional covariates. In the context of microbiome data analysis, there is a demand for considering grouping information such as structures among taxa and multiple sampling sites, resulting in multiple compositional covariates. We develop and compare two different methods of variable selection and inference strategies, based on the debiased lasso and a resampling-based approach. Confidence intervals for individual regression coefficients, obtained from each of the two methods, are shown to be asymptotically valid even in a high -dimension, low -sample -size regime. However, microbiome data often have extremely small sample sizes, rendering asymptotic results unreliable. Through extensive numerical comparisons of the finite -sample performances of the two methods, we find that resampling-based approaches outperform the debiased compositional lasso in cases of extremely small sample sizes, showing higher positive predictive values. Conversely, for larger sample sizes, debiasing yields better results. We apply the proposed multiple compositional regression to steer microbiome data, identifying key bacterial taxa associated with important cattle quality measures.
Keywords:
Variables selection
Multiple compositional data
Microbiome data
Lasso estimation
Debiasing
Resampling-based inference

Journal

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems cover
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
IF:
3.8
Papers:
4.6K
Citations:
1.2W

Organization

S
seoul national university (snu)
Scholars:
7.2W
Papers: 6.6W
Citations: 86
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

The Basidial Stage of Phymatotrichum Omnivorum
err2018-09-12
err0
PREAI
errJohn F. Baniecki; H. E. Bloss
errShare
errSave
err2002-07-01
err0
PREAI
err
errShare
errSave
Branching ratio andCPAsymmetry ofB→ρη(′)decays in the perturbative QCD approach
err2006-04-04
err0
errOAAI
errXin Liu; Huisheng Wang; Zhenjun Xiao; Libo Guo; Cai-Dian Lü
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Search for invisible decays of theΥ(1S)resonance
err2007-02-09
err0
errOAAI
errP. Rubin; C. Cawlfield; B. I. Eisenstein; I. Karliner; D. Kim; N. Lowrey; P. Naik; M. Selen; E. J. White; J. Wiss; R. E. Mitchell; M. R. Shepherd; D. Besson; T. K. Pedlar; D. Cronin-Hennessy; K. Y. Gao; J. Hietala; Y. Kubota; T. Klein; B. W. Lang; R. Poling; A. W. Scott; A. Smith; P. Zweber; S. Dobbs; Z. Metreveli; K. K. Seth; A. Tomaradze; J. Ernst; K. M. Ecklund; H. Severini; W. Love; V. Savinov; O. Aquines; Z. Li; A. Lopez; S. Mehrabyan; H. Mendez; J. Ramirez; G. S. Huang; D. H. Miller; V. Pavlunin; B. Sanghi; I. P. J. Shipsey; B. Xin; G. S. Adams; M. Anderson; J. P. Cummings; I. Danko; D. Hu; B. Moziak; J. Napolitano; Q. He; J. Insler; H. Muramatsu; C. S. Park; E. H. Thorndike; F. Yang; T. E. Coan; Y. S. Gao; M. Artuso; S. Blusk; J. Butt; J. Li; N. Menaa; R. Mountain; S. Nisar; K. Randrianarivony; R. Sia; T. Skwarnicki; S. Stone; J. C. Wang; K. Zhang; G. Bonvicini; D. Cinabro; M. Dubrovin; A. Lincoln; D. M. Asner; K. W. Edwards; R. A. Briere; T. Ferguson; G. Tatishvili; H. Vogel; M. E. Watkins; J. L. Rosner; N. E. Adam; J. P. Alexander; D. G. Cassel; J. E. Duboscq; R. Ehrlich; L. Fields; R. S. Galik; L. Gibbons; R. Gray; S. W. Gray; D. L. Hartill; B. K. Heltsley; D. Hertz; C. D. Jones; J. Kandaswamy; D. L. Kreinick; V. E. Kuznetsov; H. Mahlke-Krüger; P. U. E. Onyisi; J. R. Patterson; D. Peterson; J. Pivarski; D. Riley; A. Ryd; A. J. Sadoff; H. Schwarthoff; X. Shi; S. Stroiney; W. M. Sun; T. Wilksen; S. B. Athar; R. Patel; V. Potlia; J. Yelton
errShare
errSave
researcher View more