1
Return

Vulnerability trade-offs and externalities of an ‘effective’ adaptation programme: why assessing adaptation effectiveness needs to consider the perceptions of target populations

delete2026-05-23
delete0
PRE
AI
M
Mar Moure *
B
Birgit Schmook
C
Carsten Smith‐Hall
S
Sophie Calmé
J
Jette Bredahl Jacobsen
DOI:10.1080/17565529.2026.2655419delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Adaptation interventions often struggle to assess effectiveness and sustain adaptive behaviours. This study examines whether incorporating target groups' perceptions throughout the project cycle can reduce intervention risks and identifies the challenges involved. Drawing on a Mexican agroforestry programme, we analyse perceptions of risk, tolerance, preferences and expectations among target populations, including perceived costs and benefits of observed and anticipated impacts. We triangulate interviews, focus groups, household surveys and national datasets to capture the views of both programme beneficiaries and the wider community. While agroforestry is widely perceived to reduce climate risk, we find substantial divergence between programme and population perspectives. Beneficiaries report short-term adaptation gains but also perceive long-term risks of ineffective, inefficient or maladaptive outcomes-concerns not reflected in the programme design-which may undermine sustained participation. Non-beneficiaries report being worse off in both relative and absolute terms due to economic, environmental and social changes attributed to the programme. The study also reveals significant limitations in national data systems for evaluating adaptation interventions, a timely issue given the need for indicators under the Global Goal on Adaptation. We conclude that mitigating adaptation risks requires programme flexibility, diverse data sources and continuous engagement with target communities throughout the project cycle.
Keywords:
Maladaptation
spillover effects
risk tolerance
Sembrando Vida
adaptation metrics
agroforestry

Journal

Climate and Development cover
Climate and Development
IF:
3.4
Papers:
1.1K
Citations:
3.1K

Organization

E
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur
Scholars:
23
Papers: 18
Citations: 887
U
university of copenhagen
Scholars:
6.3K
Papers: 2.5K
Citations: 0
U
universite de sherbrooke
Scholars:
316
Papers: 138
Citations: 0
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers