arrow
Return

What Makes Agile Software Development Agile?

delete2022-09-01
delete28
delete
OA
AI
M
Marco Kuhrmann *
P
Paolo Tell
R
Regina Hebig
J
Jil Klünder
J
Jürgen Münch
O
Oliver Linssen
D
Dietmar Pfahl
M
Michael Felderer
C
Christian R. Prause
S
Stephen G. MacDonell
J
Joyce Nakatumba‐Nabende
D
David Raffo
S
Sarah Beecham
E
Eray Tüzün
G
Gustavo López
N
Nicolás Paéz
D
Diego Fontdevila
S
Sherlock A. Licorish
S
Steffen Küpper
G
Günther Ruhe
E
Eric Knauss
Ö
Özden Özcan‐Top
P
Paul Clarke
F
Fergal McCaffery
M
Marcela Genero
A
Aurora Vizcaíno
M
Mario Piattini
M
Marcos Kalinowski
T
Tayana Conte
R
Rafael Prikladnicki
S
Stephan Krusche
A
Ahmet Coşkunçay
E
Ezequiel Scott
F
Fabio Calefato
S
Svetlana Pimonova
R
Rolf-Helge Pfeiffer
U
Ulrik Pagh Schultz
R
Rogardt Heldal
M
Masud Fazal-Baqaie
C
Craig Anslow
M
Maleknaz Nayebi
K
Kurt Schneider
S
Stefan Sauer
D
Dietmar Winkler
S
Stefan Biffl
M
María Cecilia Bastarrica
I
Ita Richardson
DOI:10.1109/TSE.2021.3099532delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Together with many success stories, promises such as the increase in production speed and the improvement in stakeholders' collaboration have contributed to making agile a transformation in the software industry in which many companies want to take part. However, driven either by a natural and expected evolution or by contextual factors that challenge the adoption of agile methods as prescribed by their creator(s), software processes in practice mutate into hybrids over time. Are these still agile? In this article, we investigate the question: what makes a software development method agile? We present an empirical study grounded in a large-scale international survey that aims to identify software development methods and practices that improve or tame agility. Based on 556 data points, we analyze the perceived degree of agility in the implementation of standard project disciplines and its relation to used development methods and practices. Our findings suggest that only a small number of participants operate their projects in a purely traditional or agile manner (under 15 percent). That said, most project disciplines and most practices show a clear trend towards increasing degrees of agility. Compared to the methods used to develop software, the selection of practices has a stronger effect on the degree of agility of a given discipline. Finally, there are no methods or practices that explicitly guarantee or prevent agility. We conclude that agility cannot be defined solely at the process level. Additional factors need to be taken into account when trying to implement or improve agility in a software company. Finally, we discuss the field of software process-related research in the light of our findings and present a roadmap for future research.
Keywords:
Software
Instruments
Companies
Data collection
Market research
Collaboration
Standards
Agile software development
hybrid development methods
survey research
software development
software process

Journal

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering cover
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
IF:
5.6
Papers:
2.8K
Citations:
1.1W

Organization

U
University of Innsbruck
Scholars:
9.8K
Papers: 8.6K
Citations: 8
A
Ataturk University
Scholars:
5.3K
Papers: 5.1K
Citations: 4
U
University of Calgary
Scholars:
3.8W
Papers: 3.3W
Citations: 52
U
Universidad Costa Rica
Scholars:
3.0K
Papers: 2.1K
Citations: 21
R
Reutlingen University
Scholars:
305
Papers: 243
Citations: 349
I
ihsan dogramaci bilkent university
Scholars:
3.6K
Papers: 3.5K
Citations: 8
U
University of Passau
Scholars:
692
Papers: 680
Citations: 515
L
Leibniz University Hannover
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 8.5K
Citations: 1.1W
M
makerere university
Scholars:
9.0K
Papers: 5.3K
Citations: 8
C
chalmers university of technology
Scholars:
1.5W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 10
P
Portland State University
Scholars:
3.3K
Papers: 3.3K
Citations: 5.0K
P
pontificia universidade catolica do rio grande do sul
Scholars:
4.2K
Papers: 2.4K
Citations: 2
U
universita degli studi di bari aldo moro
Scholars:
2.1W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 9
U
universite de montreal
Scholars:
4.6W
Papers: 3.8W
Citations: 46
G
german aerospace centre (dlr)
Scholars:
5.8K
Papers: 4.4K
Citations: 6
W
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
Scholars:
2.2K
Papers: 2.2K
Citations: 1.4K
D
Dublin City University
Scholars:
5.6K
Papers: 5.0K
Citations: 5.2K
U
University of Tartu
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 7.5K
Citations: 1.5W
U
University of Southern Denmark
Scholars:
2.1W
Papers: 2.0W
Citations: 2.9W
H
Helmholtz Association
Scholars:
13.2W
Papers: 10.7W
Citations: 145
I
IT University Copenhagen
Scholars:
353
Papers: 345
Citations: 13
V
Victoria University Wellington
Scholars:
5.6K
Papers: 5.9K
Citations: 54
U
University of Paderborn
Scholars:
2.9K
Papers: 2.7K
Citations: 2
U
universidade federal de amazonas
Scholars:
2.8K
Papers: 1.6K
Citations: 1
P
Polytechnique Montreal
Scholars:
3.7K
Papers: 3.4K
Citations: 42
T
Technische Universitat Wien
Scholars:
1.3W
Papers: 1.1W
Citations: 21
A
Auckland University of Technology
Scholars:
4.0K
Papers: 4.4K
Citations: 4.7K
T
tu clausthal
Scholars:
1.8K
Papers: 1.7K
Citations: 14
M
Middle East Technical University
Scholars:
7.4K
Papers: 6.7K
Citations: 6.3K
T
Technical University of Munich
Scholars:
5.2W
Papers: 3.9W
Citations: 6.2W
U
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Scholars:
9.9K
Papers: 9.1K
Citations: 7
U
university of otago
Scholars:
1.8W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 15
U
universidad de chile
Scholars:
2.1W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 18
researcher View more organizations