1
Return

When forests look not good enough: change assessment methodology? Response to Mauser et al. (2026): “When good forests look bad: Methodological biases in EU conservation status reporting”

delete2026-06-20
delete0
PRE
AI
G
Götz Ellwanger *
U
Ulrike Raths
M
Markus Roehling
A
Axel Ssymank
M
Mareike Vischer-Leopold
DOI：10.1016/j.biocon.2026.111956delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En

Journal

Biological Conservation cover
Biological Conservation
IF:
4.4
Papers:
1.0W
Citations:
4.0W

Organization

F
Federal Agency for Nature Conservation
Scholars:
6
Papers: 616
Citations: 197
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers